Three estimates - Different Panels

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nomadh
    replied
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    I don't know if it's as interesting as it is more often a no B.S. site than some others. If old hands here seem to show a preference - although I'd suggest not universal or for all applications - for string inverters, it's probably got something to do with an engineering outlook on the world gained by formal education in the sciences and engineering, and more importantly product knowledge gained by experience. Also, snowflakes be damned, some of us old farts tend to favor straight talk and see political correctness for the impediment to progress that it is.
    I think so too. I was pushing back on string inverter in my head but ended up doing it and have been very happy. I do wish I had a data portal saving a history of my output to compare but it's been great and thevstring guys are right. They don't push the point enough that small shading issues are not a good reason to go per panel either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike 134
    replied
    Originally posted by Ampster

    The rules have changed the economics as well. The requirement for panel level Rapid Shut Down in many jurisdictions has made the Keep it Simple argument moot. I have had both systems and they each have their pros and cons. Visit some other forums and you will see a balanced view.
    That's what drove me to use an optimizer, had to put something up there for rapid shutdown so decided on optimizers. (will let you know how it all works out once it's up and running.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampster
    replied
    Originally posted by nomadh
    This is an interesting site. I see the old hands here push hard for string inverters and it feels a little curmudgeonly while all the new sexy tech is per panel. I was sold on the per panel concept as a techie and wanted reports and all. .......
    The rules have changed the economics as well. The requirement for panel level Rapid Shut Down in many jurisdictions has made the Keep it Simple argument moot. I have had both systems and they each have their pros and cons. Visit some other forums and you will see a balanced view.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by nomadh
    This is an interesting site. I see the old hands here push hard for string inverters and it feels a little curmudgeonly while all the new sexy tech is per panel. I was sold on the per panel concept as a techie and wanted reports and all. In the end I went with sma only because at the time I had a father in law that needed a breathing machine and I have felt daytime solar was important and the extra cost of batteries was just no way. I had serious per panel envy and although have a very clear southern exposure I was sure that 3pm shade inclusion was going to destroy my output. Well I never saw any massive drop-off from shade. It seemed very linear as the sun went down
    Many of the conversations pushing string inverters don't usually seem to mention shading from either side. 5 years ago shading was the primary reason to have per panel control. The word was that a few leaves or a corner of shade would DESTROY your output. Even after watching my system I was still considering adding a few tigos to affected areas.
    Now I see this comparison and it shows the shading boogeyman may have been very overrated?
    https://youtu.be/UQ9Szhl1ceQ
    I don't know if it's as interesting as it is more often a no B.S. site than some others. If old hands here seem to show a preference - although I'd suggest not universal or for all applications - for string inverters, it's probably got something to do with an engineering outlook on the world gained by formal education in the sciences and engineering, and more importantly product knowledge gained by experience. Also, snowflakes be damned, some of us old farts tend to favor straight talk and see political correctness for the impediment to progress that it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • nomadh
    replied
    This is an interesting site. I see the old hands here push hard for string inverters and it feels a little curmudgeonly while all the new sexy tech is per panel. I was sold on the per panel concept as a techie and wanted reports and all. In the end I went with sma only because at the time I had a father in law that needed a breathing machine and I have felt daytime solar was important and the extra cost of batteries was just no way. I had serious per panel envy and although have a very clear southern exposure I was sure that 3pm shade inclusion was going to destroy my output. Well I never saw any massive drop-off from shade. It seemed very linear as the sun went down
    Many of the conversations pushing string inverters don't usually seem to mention shading from either side. 5 years ago shading was the primary reason to have per panel control. The word was that a few leaves or a corner of shade would DESTROY your output. Even after watching my system I was still considering adding a few tigos to affected areas.
    Now I see this comparison and it shows the shading boogeyman may have been very overrated?

    Leave a comment:


  • bcroe
    replied
    I also still have all the original panels, which went operational in June 2013. Your lifetime
    production is about 1.5 times mine per array KW, largely reflecting the constant clouds
    here at 42 deg lat, and some shade. Bruce Roe

    Leave a comment:


  • MGE
    replied
    Not to rain on this parade but I installed my system back in May of 2013 and have had zero problems with a single panel or micro inverter on my roof. Occasionally Once in a blue moon my Enphase Monitor Display looses network connection but I just unplug the wifi extender next to it to reboot and it all comes back up to the current time. I installed my 8.84KW DC system of (34) Suniva 260w panels with Enphase M215 micros and haven't had any issues. FWIW I like being able to view the production on their website as it lets me know when to trim certain trees if the shadows start growing and effect production.
    Just checked my total lifetime production and it said 106MW. From where I sit I think it's paying out pretty well.

    Leave a comment:


  • robbyg
    replied
    Originally posted by solardreamer

    For DIY installers, it should be even easier to replace a microinverter or two since they installed the whole thing themselves.
    Hats off to those who did a second floor sloping roof mount by themselves. That is the one part of my system that I am getting a professional to do.
    There is no way I am going up there alone to pull out several panels and change a Micro Inverter!
    I have the knowledge but its safer to just spend the money.

    Leave a comment:


  • solardreamer
    replied
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    I wouldn't confuse easy with knowledgeable. Replacing a micro in the center of an array is a PITA regardless of knowledge of how to do it. Replacing a string inverter ina garage might require moving a vehicle.
    Agree but I didn't say easy.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by solardreamer

    For DIY installers, it should be even easier to replace a microinverter or two since they installed the whole thing themselves.
    I wouldn't confuse easy with knowledgeable. Replacing a micro in the center of an array is a PITA regardless of knowledge of how to do it. Replacing a string inverter ina garage might require moving a vehicle.

    Leave a comment:


  • solardreamer
    replied
    Originally posted by robbyg

    Comes back to the question of 24 Micro Inverters VS 1 String Inverter failing and do you care if one or two micro inverters are dead. As for replacing the sting Inverter, I would have no issue replacing my Sol-Ark 12K myself. Once installed it's pretty easy to switch off all the breakers, test with a meter and then just do a swap out. I know they are even making Inverter models now where the Top half with the inverter just lifts off and leaves the lower half with the wiring intact. As for allowing your String Inverters to overheat due to a bad installation location, that's your bad!
    You have a choice in controlling the temperature around a string Inverter but you have no control with Micro Inverters.
    For DIY installers, it should be even easier to replace a microinverter or two since they installed the whole thing themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by solar pete
    Hi All,

    Give me a good string inverter everyday of the week and twice on Sundays, boxes full of electronics on roofs is a recipe for failure, we have hundreds of micro sites, hundreds of power optimiser sites and thousands of string inverter sites, I wish they were all string inverter sites
    Candor being and becoming a more scarce attribute these days, if I ever come across a guy carrying a lamp by the name of Diogenes, I'll send him in your and Solarix' direction and maybe end his quest.

    Leave a comment:


  • solar pete
    replied
    Hi All,

    Give me a good string inverter everyday of the week and twice on Sundays, boxes full of electronics on roofs is a recipe for failure, we have hundreds of micro sites, hundreds of power optimiser sites and thousands of string inverter sites, I wish they were all string inverter sites

    Leave a comment:


  • robbyg
    replied
    Originally posted by solardreamer

    How would an installer replace a failed string inverter at a customer site without truck roll?

    BTW, lots of string inverters get installed in crowded garages without climate control or ventilation which could be even hotter than open rooftops in places that get breezes.
    Comes back to the question of 24 Micro Inverters VS 1 String Inverter failing and do you care if one or two micro inverters are dead. As for replacing the sting Inverter, I would have no issue replacing my Sol-Ark 12K myself. Once installed it's pretty easy to switch off all the breakers, test with a meter and then just do a swap out. I know they are even making Inverter models now where the Top half with the inverter just lifts off and leaves the lower half with the wiring intact. As for allowing your String Inverters to overheat due to a bad installation location, that's your bad!
    You have a choice in controlling the temperature around a string Inverter but you have no control with Micro Inverters.
    Last edited by robbyg; 06-08-2021, 01:05 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • solardreamer
    replied
    Originally posted by robbyg

    Of course that warranty is not going to help you if the panels are mounted on the roof of a two story building and the one that is dead is somewhere in the middle. Your going to need a truck roll for that and it's going to be very expensive.

    How would an installer replace a failed string inverter at a customer site without truck roll?

    BTW, lots of string inverters get installed in crowded garages without climate control or ventilation which could be even hotter than open rooftops in places that get breezes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...