Solar panel costs 'set to fall'

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jason
    Administrator
    • Dec 2008
    • 990

    #1

    Solar panel costs 'set to fall'

    The cost of installing and owning solar panels will fall even faster than expected according to new research.

    Tests show that 90% of existing solar panels last for 30 years, instead of the predicted 20 years.

    According to the independent EU Energy Institute, this brings down the lifetime cost.

    The institute says the panels are such a good long-term investment that banks should offer mortgages on them like they do on homes.

    At a conference, the institute forecast that solar panels would be cost-competitive with energy from the grid for half the homes in Europe by 2020 - without a subsidy.

    Incentive programmes for solar panels in Germany, Italy and Spain have created manufacturing volume that's bringing down costs. Solar panel prices dropped 30% last year alone due to an increase in output and a drop in orders because of the recession.

    But Heinz Ossenbrink, who works at the institute, said China had underpinned its solar industry with a big solar domestic programme which would keep prices falling. There are large-scale solar plans in the US and India too.

    Panels had been expected to last for 20 years and price calculations were based on this (with a free energy source, purchase and installation represent almost the entire price of solar power).

    But Dr Ossenbrink says the institute's laboratory has been subjecting the cells to the sort of accelerated ageing through extremes of heat, cold and humidity that has long been a benchmark for the car industry.


    Long lifetime
    It has shown that more than 90% of the panels on the market 10 years ago are capable of still performing well after 30 years of life, albeit with a slight drop in performance.

    Dr Ossenbrink says 40-year panels will be on the market soon.
    A key goal for solar is what is known as grid parity. That is the point when it is as cheap for someone to generate power on their homes as it is to buy it from the grid.

    It varies from country to country depending on electricity prices, but the institute estimates that Italy - which has a combination of sunny weather and relatively high electricity prices - should reach grid parity next year. Half of Europe should be enjoying grid parity by 2020, it estimates.

    Cloudy northern countries like the UK could wait further, possibly up to 2030. But the day would come when solar panels on homes would be cost-competitive without a subsidy, even in Britain.

    Dr Ossenbrink says: "Basically everything (in the industry) is bound to grow still further. Growing further means less cost. Less cost means grid parity."

    "We have been surprised in the past five years at the drop in prices. It's due to good incentive programmes first in Germany then Spain and Italy. That created a kind of a boom that was helping industry to reduce costs and get into profitability. And when an industry is in profit it drives on its own."


    Owning solar
    Professor Wim Sinke, from Utrecht University in the Netherlands, who leads the solar umbrella group the European Photovoltaic Technology Platform, says the industry has even greater ambitions.

    "The target of the sector as a whole is to reach grid parity in almost all of Europe over the next 10 years. So by 2020 we should have grid parity in most of Europe," he told BBC News.

    Key sticking points for domestic solar, he said, would be the lack of flexibility in electricity grids to take in surplus generated energy and difficulties with finance.

    Dr Ossenbrink said: "What I would like to see is the finance sector saying solar power is a product like financing a house - except they can predict the value of the solar panel much more safely than they can predict the value of the house in a volatile market.

    "Electricity will never be given away free. Banks should offer mortgages on people's solar panels like they do on homes - the bank should own the panel, then it would transfer to the householder when the loan has been paid off. It would be perfect for life assurances."

    It will take much longer for solar to match fossil fuel power at the point of generation, the institute says, as wholesale electricity prices are much lower than retail prices.


    Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8386460.stm
  • philpaine
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 37

    #2
    But PV panels are still expensive.

    If you are looking for the most bangs per buck, then I think the first thing to invest in is Insulation (but it is not a very sexy subject).

    Then look an installing Hot Water (thermal) Solar Panels or Tiles. Even in the UK these should pay for themselves in 8 -12 years or less (the steep rise in fuel costs is giving an improved ROI).

    Then consider installing a heat pump - this may or may not work for you, depending on you home and the current method of central heating/cooling used.

    Finally, install PV panels/tiles.

    I understand the attractiveness of going the PV route. If fuel prices continue to rise at their current rate, the sums for PV can only get better. However, my gut feel is that insulation then hot water panels then (possibly) a heat pump should come first, if your head rules your heart!

    Personally, I currently don't have the money to invest - but if I did I would be very attracted to installing cavity wall insulation and then re-roofing the house and putting in a combination of solar tiles and PV tiles ($$$$$)!

    All the best

    Phil

    Comment

    • solarlightingplanet
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 9

      #3
      Yea as a solar retailer I was in contact with a big solar panel manufacture and they were talking about many retailers getting away from selling them because the profit margins are bad. I think now with the technology it's becoming cheaper to make them, so prices will continue to fall, but incentive's like higher quality and so on will still play it's roll.

      Comment

      • innovativesolar
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 6

        #4
        "Tests show that 90% of existing solar panels last for 30 years, instead of the predicted 20 years. According to the independent EU Energy Institute, this brings down the lifetime cost. "


        As a retailer in the solar panel industry, it is always great to hear that products on the market are exceeding original expectations and that lifetime costs are actually lower than originally thought. This should make solar energy more of a viable option for more people. As the solar industry expands and grows, more technology will be available and efficiency should increase.

        -R. Howard
        Innovative Solar

        "It is our belief that the energy choices we make today will profoundly impact the future of life on our planet. Solar power is an effective, proven alternative to traditional utility power, and for many locations around the world it is one of the only alternatives."
        Innovative Solar Solutions | [URL="http://www.innovativesolar.com"]Solar panels[/URL]
        "Solar powered systems for all applications."

        Comment

        • Sunking
          Solar Fanatic
          • Feb 2010
          • 23301

          #5
          Wel Solar panel prices are dropping, not so much from manufacturing efficiency more from a supply and demand. Look at any listed solar manufacture ytd sales and share price. Try Evergreen or First Solar. Evergreen will be out of biz any day now, last stock price was $1.12 per share with an EPS of -$1.45. That is down 30% in a week, and 95% over a year.

          So be careful whose product you buy today because there is a good chance they will not be around tomorrow.
          MSEE, PE

          Comment

          • Mike90250
            Moderator
            • May 2009
            • 16020

            #6
            Originally posted by Sunking
            Evergreen will be out of biz any day now, last stock price was $1.12 per share with an EPS of -$1.45. That is down 30% in a week, and 95% over a year.

            So be careful whose product you buy today because there is a good chance they will not be around tomorrow.

            Well, i'm glad I got a few spares then !! I've understood evergreens were a bit better with off-angle lighting, and hold up as well as anything else.
            Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
            || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
            || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

            solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
            gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

            Comment

            • pvpbryan
              Junior Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 9

              #7
              Great news. If we could subsidize R & D in solar and shift it away from coal and oil, that would be a great boon to the industry, which has led to solar and biogas becoming profitable in markets like Germany.
              [URL="http://www.pvpower.com/"]PVPower.com[/URL]

              Comment

              • russ
                Solar Fanatic
                • Jul 2009
                • 10360

                #8
                @pnpbryan - You don't think solar R&D has received very large funding from the US gov?

                The only way Germany managed the number of solar installations they have is through a FİT that is definitely not sustainable.

                The R&D effort needs to be in all areas as we will be using oil and gas for many years to come!
                [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                Comment

                Working...