Of course, these systems are very expensive, but have become much cheaper in recent years + with the ionic liquids, the production costs are reduced even further.
If a sufficient number is ordered then the prices are higher.
Without strong subsidies here (tax relief, for example) or political increases in the price of electricity (which is what we like to have here), such systems are not interesting.if you don't have your own proper manufacturers, then import them from abroad. I also have an import machine from Germany + cooler from italy.
first of all what maintenance costs? I have no maintenance costs. Absorption refrigeration systems are very primitive.
coefficient of performance is somthin of the 90s or 2000`s. We do use since 200er energy efficiency ratio (EER).
EAW in 98630 Römhild for example in Germany "Li-Br." starting 15 KW ( Prior 5KW) and is selling in projects in Switzerland. Lets stay stay in outdated unity "COP" 0,75. Starting at 172,4 F°Normal
"COP" for manufacturers at our market + CE at the moment is between 0,7 - 0,83 (Manufacturer Entropie for his very mig unites for example 0,83) on Li-Br. Most prototypes with ionic liquids are between 0.8 and 0.85 " COP" starting between 68° C and 78° C and will start the next 2-5 years.
I am amazed at the efficiency of "typical" solar collectors in your market of "typical" 65%. Mybe in US you do use another word for "efficiency" ? My collectors from 1999 do have 70% here.
Optical efficiency: The maximum solar thermal efficiency is achieved when the solar power absorber is at the same temperature as the surroundings. However, 100% efficiency is impossible.
The efficiency of solar thermal energy usually drops / warmer the absorber is in comparison to the surroundings. With regard to this phenomenon, one speaks of “optical efficiency”. The average solar efficiency here is between 70 and 85 percent. Manufacturers report the values of the optical efficiency for their products, which enables the efficiency of the technical systems to be compared in order to find the optimal solar thermal product. Chinese do it here too.
In summary, your calculations do not work with our manufacturers and conditions. It looks like you do have completely outdated technology + no suppliers etc.. I recommend an absorption chiller from Germany EWA for example to everyone here in my Canton who owns an normal house + normal payed tax payer job and if he produces enough excess heat energy in the summer ( a lot of sollar collectors).
This has the advantage that you do not need the ugly "usual" air conditioning systems made in china, you save electricity and money, as well as noise and can at least strongly reduce your income tax burden here. You also protect the environment from unnecessary power plant systems + the escape of climate-damaging gases + does not have to cover solar panels in summer.
If a sufficient number is ordered then the prices are higher.
Without strong subsidies here (tax relief, for example) or political increases in the price of electricity (which is what we like to have here), such systems are not interesting.if you don't have your own proper manufacturers, then import them from abroad. I also have an import machine from Germany + cooler from italy.
first of all what maintenance costs? I have no maintenance costs. Absorption refrigeration systems are very primitive.
coefficient of performance is somthin of the 90s or 2000`s. We do use since 200er energy efficiency ratio (EER).
EAW in 98630 Römhild for example in Germany "Li-Br." starting 15 KW ( Prior 5KW) and is selling in projects in Switzerland. Lets stay stay in outdated unity "COP" 0,75. Starting at 172,4 F°Normal
"COP" for manufacturers at our market + CE at the moment is between 0,7 - 0,83 (Manufacturer Entropie for his very mig unites for example 0,83) on Li-Br. Most prototypes with ionic liquids are between 0.8 and 0.85 " COP" starting between 68° C and 78° C and will start the next 2-5 years.
I am amazed at the efficiency of "typical" solar collectors in your market of "typical" 65%. Mybe in US you do use another word for "efficiency" ? My collectors from 1999 do have 70% here.
Optical efficiency: The maximum solar thermal efficiency is achieved when the solar power absorber is at the same temperature as the surroundings. However, 100% efficiency is impossible.
The efficiency of solar thermal energy usually drops / warmer the absorber is in comparison to the surroundings. With regard to this phenomenon, one speaks of “optical efficiency”. The average solar efficiency here is between 70 and 85 percent. Manufacturers report the values of the optical efficiency for their products, which enables the efficiency of the technical systems to be compared in order to find the optimal solar thermal product. Chinese do it here too.
In summary, your calculations do not work with our manufacturers and conditions. It looks like you do have completely outdated technology + no suppliers etc.. I recommend an absorption chiller from Germany EWA for example to everyone here in my Canton who owns an normal house + normal payed tax payer job and if he produces enough excess heat energy in the summer ( a lot of sollar collectors).
This has the advantage that you do not need the ugly "usual" air conditioning systems made in china, you save electricity and money, as well as noise and can at least strongly reduce your income tax burden here. You also protect the environment from unnecessary power plant systems + the escape of climate-damaging gases + does not have to cover solar panels in summer.
Comment