Because of the relatively poor film coefficients of air or most other gases at/near atmospheric pressure when compared to liquids, turbulence is important but a large surface area is usually more important. Both are usually two common features of air cooled collectors. Since the relative power difference required to pump a given mass of two different fluids is in large part, but not entirely, proportional to the ratio of the specific volume of the fluids, another big consideration for air cooled collectors is required pumping power and its cost. One goal of good heat exchanger design, including solar collector design is a balance of tradeoffs, often making screen/mesh/fins/spirals/etc. materials with a high surf to vol. ratio and large void fraction usually better than relatively smoother surfaces, provided any increase in the pressure drop can be managed.
Bottom line: Air collectors need more surface area, and pumping costs (and noise) will be higher than liquid collectors for similar mass flow rates. But, big advantages: air collectors seldom freeze and if they're not leak proof, no one knows or cares much.
Bottom line: Air collectors need more surface area, and pumping costs (and noise) will be higher than liquid collectors for similar mass flow rates. But, big advantages: air collectors seldom freeze and if they're not leak proof, no one knows or cares much.
Comment