After 12 to 14 months? You must be using that new math they teach today - were no matter what the result is they call it correct so the little *** won't feel bad. That 40$ LED is for green fools that want to feel good.
You shouldn't listen to whatever fool told you such things - a CFL gives off dirty power - meaningless statement.
Kettybell was pretty much on.
LED vs CFL - 2
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Last edited by russ; 10-25-2011, 12:47 PM. -
I've been told that cfls give off dirty intermittent power and LEDs do not.
CFLs when disposed of contaminate water and soil with mercury, it's really an overall dirty product, it's archaic and out dated from an engineering standpoint, just over all bad. I would rather prefer going back to the dark ages with halogen and spend the extra money for per watt lumens rather than dealing with cfls frOm an environmental stand point.Leave a comment:
-
And the savings / payback changes, as you toss a $1 CFL, and replace it with a $40 LEDLeave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=kettybell;34671]LED someday might compete and become mainstream, but for now they should only be used for special task lighting like flashlights, tail lights, and landscape lightingLeave a comment:
-
I am familiar with H7 Fog Lights and the ones I know about are rated less than 50 Lumens per watt. This one you have is claiming 108 Lumens/watt.Leave a comment:
-
wooops ... speed reading failed meLeave a comment:
-
hmmm... 5w CFL runs like 2 bucks here at home depot.
Where and why are you paying $8 bucks for oneLeave a comment:
-
LED vs CFL - 2
(
Leave a comment: