X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ampster
    Solar Fanatic
    • Jun 2017
    • 3658

    #16
    Originally posted by foo1bar
    Busbar is 125A
    125A * 120% = 150A.
    If the main breaker feeding that is 125A and the backfeed breaker is 50A, that is a total of 175A.
    175A is more than 150A, therefore not code compliant.
    That clarifies that calculation.
    ...........
    What are the subpanels?
    Do you only have a main breaker, a breaker for the subpanel (for the branch circuits) and a breaker for the backfeed?
    IF that's the situation, then IF all the breakers on the busbar sum up to less than (or equal to) the main breaker, I think you would be compliant.
    BUT that option for being code compliant wouldn't be using the 120% * main breaker - it would be just: Is main_breaker >= (sum_of_all_other_breakers)? (And more importantly busbar >= sum_of_all_other_breakers)
    This approach is the "(3)(c)" section in the code.
    Yes, I will have a main breaker and breakers for the two subpanels, one of which will have solar backfeed. That may be my approach since I can easily distribute the loads to the subpanels with a 50 Amp breaker and a 75 Amp breaker or a combination not exceeding 125 Amps.
    Basically there are 3 options for having it be code compliant and using the busbar, spelled out in 705.12(D)(2).
    You can do 3a, 3b, OR 3c.
    But you can't use part of the phrasing from 3b and part from 3c.
    The AHJ is the real authority though - so if they say it's OK, they have final say.
    I think they'd look at it and if it's not meeting 3a, 3b, nor 3c it's not passing inspection (or plan review if they do a plan review beforehand)
    And right now I believe what you've described doesn't meet the 3a, 3b, nor 3c.
    But I may not have understood your description correctly.
    My system is a work in progress and this discussion has been helpful to know that I have options to make the smaller service panel changeout work for me. My long term goal is to self consume as much as I can and only use what I sell back to the grid as a resource to charge my EVs at super off peak rates. My plan for Phase Two is to add an additional 3 kW of solar to just run the Skybox and the loads during the day. All of that will not be part of the PTO with PGE. I already have the Skybox, 42 kWh of LFP batteries and 11 Sunpower panels to power the Skybox. I want to get that investment working as soon as I can but I need to get through the PTO and then I will pull a permit for Phase Two.

    So - back to the 200A panel.
    ........
    I started the conversation with PGE in early May and they could not give me an answer about whether I needed a new transformer if I were to go with a 200 Amp panel. Based on that uncertainty, I cancelled that request and started a new one with the like for like changeout. I have the solar installed and want to get the PTO so I can move on to Phase two which is to install the Outback Skybox. I am not worried about the lights dimming because the heat pump ACs that i plan on installing will all be inverter soft starts.
    An earlier install I did with a professional installer three years ago on another home included a new 200 Amp panel. That proved to be a nightmare for them because they did not realize I had underground service and they had to tear out some sidewalk and dig a twenty foot trench to put 3 inch conduit for the new service. It took 18 months to complete that. I never paid a dime until I got the PTO but I did not get the benefit of the NEM solar and had to juggle my EV charging when the solar was generating. Since this is a self install I have invested the capital in the panels on my roof and want to get the PTO as soon as possible. I agree for most people the best move would be the larger 200 Amp service. Since my goal is self consumption I want to move on to Phase Two of my plan as as soon as I can.
    Thanks for all the input.
    Last edited by Ampster; 08-16-2021, 10:38 AM.
    9 kW solar, 42kWh LFP storage. EV owner since 2012

    Comment

    • scrambler
      Solar Fanatic
      • Mar 2019
      • 503

      #17
      If the Main Breaker is 125A, then he should definitely use a Panel; with a higher amp busbar to allow for the load.

      The Inverter breaker would likely be 40 Amp, 1.25 x 40 = 50 Amp
      With a Main of 125Amp, that is a total of 175Amp that the busbar must be able to sustain

      This means the Bus bar should be at least 150Amp (1.2 x 150 = 180 AMp)

      It can still be a 125AMp Panel, just with a 150AMp Busbar rating

      Comment

      • Ampster
        Solar Fanatic
        • Jun 2017
        • 3658

        #18
        Originally posted by scrambler
        If the Main Breaker is 125A, then he should definitely use a Panel; with a higher amp busbar to allow for the load.
        Good thought and one I was considering but one poster said I might not be able to qualify it as a "like for like" replacement. If that is the case then the new service panel would need to be moved 36 inches further from the gas riser. That means a new service drop and new weather head. That is an expense I do not want to incur, especially if it causes a delay or triggers the need for a new transformer.

        The Inverter breaker would likely be 40 Amp, 1.25 x 40 = 50 Amp
        Actually the strings from the micros come into the subpanel on a 20 Amp and a 15 Amp breaker. The reference to 50 Amps is the breaker feeding that subpanel.



        9 kW solar, 42kWh LFP storage. EV owner since 2012

        Comment

        • scrambler
          Solar Fanatic
          • Mar 2019
          • 503

          #19
          It is all about what you can present and what they can accept indeed

          If you can refer your panel as a 125Amp panel with a 125Amp feed in breaker, yet use one that has a busbar rated 150Amp then you would be fine, but I have no idea about the intricacy of permitting....

          35A (10+15) does not make a huge difference

          20 +15 = 35 ; 35 x 1.25 = 43.75 ; 43.75 + 125 = 169 ; 169 / 1.2 = 140Amp bus bar rating

          Comment

          • Ampster
            Solar Fanatic
            • Jun 2017
            • 3658

            #20
            I just heard from my electrician that he has not ben able to convince PGE that a 125 Amp panel is a like for like replacement of my 100 Amp Zinsco service panel. It looks like we are going back to the original plan for a 200 Amp service panel. My biggest concern was the cost of a new service drop and the possibility of a transformer upgrade. We shall see what transpires and I have some tactics to avoid the cost of a new transformer.
            9 kW solar, 42kWh LFP storage. EV owner since 2012

            Comment

            • Ampster
              Solar Fanatic
              • Jun 2017
              • 3658

              #21
              My concern about the cost of the new service drop has disappeared when I got an invoice today for $75 from PGE for the longer drop. I am appreciative of the advice received earlier about the advantages of having a larger service panel. Now I can push for an early meter change to the ne
              w panel, and once that is done, get final inspection to complete the PGE application for Permission To Operate.
              Last edited by Ampster; 09-08-2021, 08:59 PM.
              9 kW solar, 42kWh LFP storage. EV owner since 2012

              Comment

              Working...