X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ButchDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie

    Sure JPM that is the logical approach, I need to maximize my finances on my system. Since I won't be using the gravy (tax credit) that floats this industry I have to be effective with my approach.
    Why will you not be using the federal tax credit? do you not pay any federal income tax?

    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    Going back to my OP, through my investigation of various designs I see that equipment costs of the PV panels, optimizers, and inverter can be had for less than $.50 a watt.
    Example; 250w panels $65ea, @$.26w P800 optimizers $50ea. @$.06w, SE6700H inverter $959 @$.095w
    Totals $.45w equipment cost (90% of equipment total)
    The P800 is a commercial optimizer that works with the 3 phase commercial inverters... and they cost more than $50 each
    Also it is for two 96 cell PV modules not two 60 cell.

    You would want the older P320 optimizers which will work with the SE7600H (there is no SE6700H) and you can likely get them cheap ( or older P300 if you can find them).
    You could get an SE5000H or SE6000H cheaper than the SE7600H

    You are also going to need rails, flash feet, conduit, AC disconnect, wires, labels, permit (costs money) and an interconnect agreement (often an application fee).

    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    I want a 5 to 6KWH system,
    You mean a 5 to 6kW system ...

    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    So @$.45 X 5000w should cost me $2250 plus $225 (10%) for COB I believe it is called. I figure $3000 for 5KWH system would be my target. This figure assumes ideal circumstances
    FYI, it is BOD and you are going to need more than $225 for BOD on a 5kW system

    You will also need racking and flashing, and standoffs or feet

    and again it is not a 5kWH system but a 5kW system

    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    with clever designing (example being a system design to actually use the full capacity of all devices: I.E 800w for the P800 optimizer)
    So far you are showing a complete lack of design with little clever to show for it.

    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    My ears are open, I am listening, thanks for your time.
    are they though?

    https://www.solaredge.com/sites/defa...tasheet-na.pdf

    NOTE: even when using these with the 208V small commercial inverters, it is difficult to get the strings to be within all the operating ranges. Even Solaredge admits this limitation with their note #5 on the optimizer spec sheets:
    Last edited by ButchDeal; 01-23-2019, 02:26 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • motorcyclemikie
    replied
    Originally posted by J.P.M.

    Reread what littleharbor just wrote. Keep reading it until memorized. Then get educated. Then start thinking long(er) term with a wider scope and past your wallet. Then go to the building dept. and listen more than you talk. Don't buy or do anything else until all that's done.
    Sure JPM that is the logical approach, I need to maximize my finances on my system. Since I won't be using the gravy (tax credit) that floats this industry I have to be effective with my approach.

    Going back to my OP, through my investigation of various designs I see that equipment costs of the PV panels, optimizers, and inverter can be had for less than $.50 a watt.
    Example; 250w panels $65ea @$.26w, P800 optimizers $50ea. @$.06w, SE6700H inverter $959 @$.095w
    Totals $.45w equipment cost (90% of equipment total)

    I want a 5 to 6KWH system,
    So @$.45 X 5000w should cost me $2250 plus $225 (10%) for COB I believe it is called. I figure $3000 for 5KWH system would be my target. This figure assumes ideal circumstances with clever designing (example being a system design to actually use the full capacity of all devices: I.E 800w for the P800 optimizer)

    Most designs I see are wasteful ,particularly with $/Watt of the optimizers. The best I can get is 750w through the P800, I am fine with that.

    My ears are open, I am listening, thanks for your time.
    Last edited by motorcyclemikie; 01-23-2019, 01:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    This is not something to experiment with, unless it's on a house isolated in a desert. Best case scenario, it won't work at all and your money goes up in smoke. Worst case scenario, your house goes up in smoke.


    I am in full agreement, I was looking for a "creative" way to bring down the cost of the system.
    It's time to visit my local building dept. for permits have a great day!


    You know, after rethinking my lack of confidence and questioning the answers (some of which were right) from the support people at Solaredge, I would think that anyone that blindly believes them probably has more money to waste on a over built system than I. My questions may seem redundant here but who better to answer them than the people in the know -- you guys. They use their marketing and misinformation to get at as much of my money as possible, I have to use my common sense to hang onto as much of it as possible.
    Reread what littleharbor just wrote. Keep reading it until memorized. Then get educated. Then start thinking long(er) term with a wider scope and past your wallet. Then go to the building dept. and listen more than you talk. Don't buy or do anything else until all that's done.

    Leave a comment:


  • littleharbor
    replied
    [


    I am in full agreement, I was looking for a "creative" way to bring down the cost of the system.



    Here's some "creative" ways to bring down the cost. Do an energy audit. Replace older less efficient appliances. Replace all lighting with LED lighting. Add extra insulation and caulking to your place. Be conscious of wasteful habits such as leaving lights on unnecessarily, heating/cooling unused space, leaving electronics plugged in 24/7/365 when only used for a fraction of that time.

    As far as buying factory second solar panels at a price that isn't much cheaper than A grade panels if you shop around, that could turn out to be a bad decision. Also trying to design a system yourself without sufficient experience could end up costing you more than the price of the equipment.

    If you still insist on building your own system based on lowest price then at the very least, educate yourself in system design and be fully aware of the equipment's intended use and limitations.

    Leave a comment:


  • azdave
    replied
    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    You know, after rethinking my lack of confidence and questioning the answers (some of which were right) from the support people at Solaredge, I would think that anyone that blindly believes them probably has more money to waste on a over built system than I. My questions may seem redundant here but who better to answer them than the people in the know -- you guys. They use their marketing and misinformation to get at as much of my money as possible, I have to use my common sense to hang onto as much of it as possible.
    I have customers that try to use our products in "creative" ways too, thinking they know better and will save money. When the install fails and it costs them big bucks to fix the damage, they get their lawyers involved and come after us looking for any little excuse to say we didn't warn them properly not to use our products in unintended ways. It costs a lot of money in liability insurance premiums each year to protect my company from people who think they know more about our products than we do.

    Leave a comment:


  • motorcyclemikie
    replied
    This is not something to experiment with, unless it's on a house isolated in a desert. Best case scenario, it won't work at all and your money goes up in smoke. Worst case scenario, your house goes up in smoke.


    I am in full agreement, I was looking for a "creative" way to bring down the cost of the system.
    It's time to visit my local building dept. for permits have a great day!


    You know, after rethinking my lack of confidence and questioning the answers (some of which were right) from the support people at Solaredge, I would think that anyone that blindly believes them probably has more money to waste on a over built system than I. My questions may seem redundant here but who better to answer them than the people in the know -- you guys. They use their marketing and misinformation to get at as much of my money as possible, I have to use my common sense to hang onto as much of it as possible.
    Last edited by motorcyclemikie; 01-22-2019, 02:56 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • NukeEngineer
    replied
    This is not something to experiment with, unless it's on a house isolated in a desert. Best case scenario, it won't work at all and your money goes up in smoke. Worst case scenario, your house goes up in smoke.

    Solaredge has all of the motivation to make their optimizers and inverters as "compatible as possible", to open up as many configurations as possible. If they specifically say "this won't work with that", there's a really really good reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • ButchDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    Uh, one last brain fart.

    The P405 optimizer has almost identical electrical specs as the P730 and Is max at 125voc and 12.6a -- that's over 1500w or +50% over the production of the three series panels. I bet this would work,
    ok so you are looking at PEAK input limits of 125Voc and 12.6a but the peak OUTPUT on the P703 is 730W and on the P405 is 405W.
    The optimizers adjust MPPT to stay within their output limits and have DC to DC buck/boost conversion as well. They the P730 can not output the power from the extreme peak limits of the range of the input which is 1,575w.

    The P405 is for thin film PV modules not crystalline.

    You can continue to argue that it might but I find it a bit telling that you are no longer willing to put your money on your view of the equipment working in a way that even the manufacturer claims it will not.


    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    plus the Solaredge inverter would not know if it is multi phase or single phase DC current, just to end that extra contension point.

    Just saying
    The solarEdge inverter and optimizers communicate with each other.
    They are computers and they definitely kNOW what equipment they are connected to.

    The inverters AND optimizers have minimum string lengths which is strings of optimizers not PV modules which are different per inverter TYPE and optimizer TYPE.
    The P730 is designated a Commercial optimizer and as such ONLY works with the commercial 3 phase inverters.

    Leave a comment:


  • motorcyclemikie
    replied
    Uh, one last brain fart.

    The P405 optimizer has almost identical electrical specs as the P730 and Is max at 125voc and 12.6a -- that's over 1500w or +50% over the production of the three series panels. I bet this would work, plus the Solaredge inverter would not know if it is multi phase or single phase DC current, just to end that extra contension point.

    Just saying

    Leave a comment:


  • motorcyclemikie
    replied
    Yeah I'm ready to roll over. The NEC 2017 RSS 80v spec would preclude attaching two of these 42voc 8A P17 panels together anyway. Three in series will total 126voc 8Asc close enough but not within the RSS spec.

    I had trouble getting into the Solaredge design, i'll try it again, thanks guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • ButchDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    Yeah Butch, I have tossed the idea of the P730 because I have been told by Solaredge Tech Sup the P730 is 3 phase only, I don't see any phasing relationship until the inverter, and their inability to provide answers correctly scares me enough to stay away from that plan.

    The electrical parameters with the three panels in series (42vdc 8Amax) each would be within the 125v spec. but there has to be something additional other than electrical parameters.
    it is 42.2V for a single PV module. put 3 in series and you would have 126.6V which is by most peoples math, OUTSIDE of the 125V max spec of the optimizer.
    Make the PV module a little code and it only gets worse...


    The documents for the optimizers specifies that they only work with the 3 phase commercial inverters and lists the models.

    the electrical is WAY WAY out of range. you are using different numbers.
    a P17-335 pv module has :

    1X 3X series
    VMPP of 42.2V 126.6V
    IMPP of 7.94A 7.94A
    VOC of 51.1V 153.3V
    ISC of 8.54A 8.54A
    wattage 335 1,005 watts

    The P730 has an absolute MAX Voltage input (Voc) of 125V < 126.6V
    MPPT operating range of 12.5V to 105V < 126.6V
    Max Short circuit amp (Isc) of 11A
    MAX DC input current of 13.75a
    rated input wattage of 730w < 1005 watts of 3 in series

    Minimum string length is 8 optimizers on 3 phase 208V inverter which is less than the 6 you would have

    This is Before temperature coefficient which will make this worse!

    Go solar, reduce your energy bills and discover why SunPower is a world standard in solar solutions for homes, businesses and utilities.


    Leave a comment:


  • ButchDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    It's not my money - but I wouldn't "guess" about which optimizer to buy. I would use the solaredge design tool to find out which of their optimizers will work with the modules I plan to purchase

    Thanks

    Yes, I didn't mean to imply that I am shooting it, I'm in the research stage.
    I still think the P730 would work, I'll have to put that research off till later.
    The string of 3 pv modules in series is out of range on almost ALL specs for the P730
    and the P730 is NOT an allowed configuration the a single phase inverter.

    It is unlikely to work,
    if it does work,... it is unlikely to work for long,
    and is definitely going to void the warranty.

    Leave a comment:


  • foo1bar
    replied
    Originally posted by motorcyclemikie
    I still think the P730 would work, I'll have to put that research off till later.
    The 3-phase inverters are different boxes - the P730 optimizers may have something about their communication with the inverter that they work with the 3-phase inverters but not the residential ones.

    Or they may just not be tested with the residential ones, and they might work.
    (But if it's not a config supported by SE, I'd not spend money on that risk.)

    Leave a comment:


  • NukeEngineer
    replied
    Originally posted by foo1bar

    It's not my money - but I wouldn't "guess" about which optimizer to buy. I would use the solaredge design tool to find out which of their optimizers will work with the modules I plan to purchase.
    112% agree.

    The design tool is very simple to use, even for someone pretty new to solar. Just pick your make/model of panel, how many you plan to have, and it will tell you which inverters, optimizers, and string configurations are supported (lists multiple options, not just a single configuration). I have seen an instance where a particular panel *should* be ok to match to a particular optimizer, but the tool says not to do so, because SE has determined (for some reason) that they aren't compatible. Just picking based on wattage alone (Pxxx = the xxx is the max wattage the optimizer can handle) is not enough.

    If you order the wrong optimizers, then once they ship they are yours unless your retailer allows returns.

    If it were me... and it was me back in summer 2017, then I would order optimizers later, after your panel racking has arrived and perhaps is even partially installed.

    Leave a comment:


  • motorcyclemikie
    replied
    It's not my money - but I wouldn't "guess" about which optimizer to buy. I would use the solaredge design tool to find out which of their optimizers will work with the modules I plan to purchase

    Thanks

    Yes, I didn't mean to imply that I am shooting it, I'm in the research stage.
    I still think the P730 would work, I'll have to put that research off till later.

    Leave a comment:

Working...