Hi everyone. This seems like a great site with a few very informed members. I'm hoping to get some feedback on a system for my house in Orange County. I am pretty new to the world of solar. I am an engineer, so I have a pretty good grasp of most things technical, and I have been researching the heck out of this subject. My business partner and one of my neighbors recently installed panels which sparked my interest.
My house is a 2-story, with a concrete Spanish tile roof in south OC. I have pretty poor layout for solar. The front of the house is AZ 245, and I do not want to paste a bunch of panels across the front. There is a small section of the front where I can put 2 panels at 245* and 2 at 155*. The balance will be on the rear at 65*. I will have a total of 27 panels. The 23 panels is the most I can fit on the rear of the house.
My last year's electric use was about 16,000kWh.
I have 2 proposals from a local contractor. one for a 27 - 275W panels, for a total of 7425W at $4.86/W. This system uses Suniva panels and Enphase M215 micro-inverters. His second proposal is for a 27 panel 315W LG system, for a total of 8505W at $5.06/W.
I also got a proposal from one of the big regional contractors (PD) for a 27 panel system using 280W Solar World panels and EnPhase M250 inverters, for a total of 7560W at $3.81/W.
It seems like a slam dunk to go with PD, but my business partner was very satisfied with the service he received from his contractor. It doesn't seem worth while to spend the extra $1.20 per Watt to get the greater overall output of the LG system. I like the monitoring system that the Suniva/Enphase system offers. Would the SolarWorld/Enphase system from PD be similar?
I am a little concerned about roof mounting / repairs / leaks, which makes me lean towards PD, since they are a roofing contractor, and warranty the roof for 20 years I believe.
I also contacted Sullivan, who refused to quote the job after I told them that I did not want to put panels on the front of the house. I have run the numbers on PVWatts, and I realize that the system is less efficient on the rear (65AZ) but it still produces about 363kWh per panel per year, compared to 438kWh on the front (245AZ). That's only about 17% less. That does not seem like a reason to refuse the project. Am I missing something?
My house is a 2-story, with a concrete Spanish tile roof in south OC. I have pretty poor layout for solar. The front of the house is AZ 245, and I do not want to paste a bunch of panels across the front. There is a small section of the front where I can put 2 panels at 245* and 2 at 155*. The balance will be on the rear at 65*. I will have a total of 27 panels. The 23 panels is the most I can fit on the rear of the house.
My last year's electric use was about 16,000kWh.
I have 2 proposals from a local contractor. one for a 27 - 275W panels, for a total of 7425W at $4.86/W. This system uses Suniva panels and Enphase M215 micro-inverters. His second proposal is for a 27 panel 315W LG system, for a total of 8505W at $5.06/W.
I also got a proposal from one of the big regional contractors (PD) for a 27 panel system using 280W Solar World panels and EnPhase M250 inverters, for a total of 7560W at $3.81/W.
It seems like a slam dunk to go with PD, but my business partner was very satisfied with the service he received from his contractor. It doesn't seem worth while to spend the extra $1.20 per Watt to get the greater overall output of the LG system. I like the monitoring system that the Suniva/Enphase system offers. Would the SolarWorld/Enphase system from PD be similar?
I am a little concerned about roof mounting / repairs / leaks, which makes me lean towards PD, since they are a roofing contractor, and warranty the roof for 20 years I believe.
I also contacted Sullivan, who refused to quote the job after I told them that I did not want to put panels on the front of the house. I have run the numbers on PVWatts, and I realize that the system is less efficient on the rear (65AZ) but it still produces about 363kWh per panel per year, compared to 438kWh on the front (245AZ). That's only about 17% less. That does not seem like a reason to refuse the project. Am I missing something?
Comment