Just my 2 cents, understanding that no two situations are alike...
Suppose I am able to pay a max (pre-qualified) $350k for a home. I find two homes at that number, one of which has a new-ish solar system installed. The home with the solar may be somewhat less appealing but is at my price point and I am more likely able to make random, less costly improvements over time as I wont have the electric bill. It is unlikely that I will be able to afford to purchase a solar system (say $20k before ITC) as I has used most of my money for a down on the house. Hence, I may be likely to lean toward the slightly lesser home with solar. It is a situation like this where a seller may get more return out of their solar system.
If none of that makes sense, I ask the moderator to feel free to delete this post.
Suppose I am able to pay a max (pre-qualified) $350k for a home. I find two homes at that number, one of which has a new-ish solar system installed. The home with the solar may be somewhat less appealing but is at my price point and I am more likely able to make random, less costly improvements over time as I wont have the electric bill. It is unlikely that I will be able to afford to purchase a solar system (say $20k before ITC) as I has used most of my money for a down on the house. Hence, I may be likely to lean toward the slightly lesser home with solar. It is a situation like this where a seller may get more return out of their solar system.
If none of that makes sense, I ask the moderator to feel free to delete this post.
Comment