I am wondering about the physical strength of mounting panels in landscape orientation,
supported by the ends? Upper panels will be spaced 8" from lower panels, minimum
spacing side to side. Perhaps the mount rails should be about 37" apart to allow
securing them the narrow way?
I have a couple reasons to mount landscape. First, snow sliding or being pushed off will
only need to move 39" to fall off, INSTEAD OF 75" (72 cell vertical) or 126" (2 vertical 63
cell panels touching). The vertical gap will keep snow from sliding from one panel to the
next lower.
The other thing is, this will allow the same general mounting scheme for either 60 cell
or 72 cell panels; they are both 39" wide, and 5 of the 72 cell are about the same
mechanical width (as well as output voltage) as 6 60 cell panels. I already have quite a
few of each, but on quite different mounts. Bruce Roe
supported by the ends? Upper panels will be spaced 8" from lower panels, minimum
spacing side to side. Perhaps the mount rails should be about 37" apart to allow
securing them the narrow way?
I have a couple reasons to mount landscape. First, snow sliding or being pushed off will
only need to move 39" to fall off, INSTEAD OF 75" (72 cell vertical) or 126" (2 vertical 63
cell panels touching). The vertical gap will keep snow from sliding from one panel to the
next lower.
The other thing is, this will allow the same general mounting scheme for either 60 cell
or 72 cell panels; they are both 39" wide, and 5 of the 72 cell are about the same
mechanical width (as well as output voltage) as 6 60 cell panels. I already have quite a
few of each, but on quite different mounts. Bruce Roe
Comment