This month.... I sold 313 KwH's @ TOU peak pricing of $ 0.22 for approx. $68
solar95.JPG
I then bought back 51 off peak Kwh's @ $0.13 for $6.60
solar96.JPG
Clearing about -$60 for the month.
solar97.JPG
....and Elon thinks I want to buy a battery from him?
His battery is about 50% the cost of my whole solar set-up.... no thanks
Most Popular Topics
Collapse
6Kw going in soon in Aliso Viejo
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
When you suddenly have full sun, striking a cold panel... you get some pretty good output!Leave a comment:
-
Looks like you should be able to handle summer nicely.
Cloudy forecast this week
Just noticed something...my Enlighten account usually shows about 730-750 watt hours produced at the 11:15am mark on sunny days. I assume the clouds just broke and it hit 893 watt hours! Is that how the panels/inverters respond to clouds then sun vs. sustained 800+ on regular sunny days?
5_3output.jpg5_4output.jpgLeave a comment:
-
I have two A/C units.... one for upstairs, one for downstairs. Both units are the same, for a 3,000 sq.ft.home. I set both thermostats for 72 degrees, and let them run all day. It was pretty warm, with a high of 86 degrees.
Skies were clear, some scattered clouds.... solar output was good at 41 KwH's.
So , how did it go?
On Peak: Noon to 5pm
solar93.JPG
It was the first time all month that I was a consumer, and not a producer during Peak . A tiny 2 Kwh's were charged to my account. It should be noted that the house keepers were here today too, for about an hour and a half. They had all the lights on, with 2 vacuums running the whole time. Solar did a great job, keeping up with demand.
Off Peak: All other times
solar91.JPG
Off peak was about what its been for the last week. Friday was pretty hectic after school let out.... the kids were home with friends, wifey baked a lasagna for dinner. Then friends came over after dinner, and into the evening. Power use was higher than normal. We were dinged by SCE for 20 KhW's.
So , in conclusion.... I had the biggest use day all year, keeping the house at 72 degrees all day plus all the extra stuff that went on, and my SCE bill for the day was :
Peak: 2 Kwh's x $ 0.22 = $0.44
Off Peak: 20 KwH's x $0.13 = $2.60
Total for the day: $ 3.04
Not too bad, considering...
Let me know if you have any other questions...Leave a comment:
-
That S.P. panels may degrade a bit less year/year is something we must take S.P's word for through accelerated testing. I'm not willing to do that just yet. First off , they have skin in the game. Second, accelerated testing may/may not cover reality as well as the seller may know, or talk about. Thirdly, it's a moot point: That lower degradation rate, such as it may exist is effectively impossible to verify for the average homeowner.
Any actual additional output due to the lower alleged S.P. degradation rate may have a net present worth greater than the usual S.P. upfront price premium, but for my assumptions about future rates, inflation, etc. to work, those assumptions need to be less realistic than I'm comfortable with.
If a homeowner is cramped for space, a more effective way of dealing with the situation is to reduce the load by about by very roughly 10-20%, thus reducing the required system size by that much and thus allowing the use of panels with a larger footprint and it about the same footprint as the S.P. system. Then, buying LG, Solarworld, Kyocera, etc., for about 20% less/Watt. The first benefit is the electric bill goes down, maybe/probably a lot more than 20%, especially w/tiered rates. Next, you're buying, say a 15% smaller system and on top of and compounding that, you're paying about $0.70 less net per Watt. Sounds like a win/win/win for a likely lower $$ investment in conservation measures.
A back of envelope example:
On 10,000 kWh/yr. usage in San Diego,, inland, tiered rate. Current bill is very approx. $2,475/yr.
Say a 6 kW system is required to offset the entire load. --->>> 18 * 327 = 5,886 W * $4.50/W = $26,487 *.70 = $18,541.
Now, reduce the load by 15%: the annual bill becomes ~ $1,900.
The required system size to off set that load is now 15% smaller: 6,000 *.85 = 5,100 W.
Replace the S.P. (327's) with 18 LG 280's.--->>> 5,040 W @$3.50/W = $17,640 *.70 = $12,349.
Net system price diff. after tax credit: $18,541 - $12349 = $6,192.
initial bill reduction : $2,475 - $1,900 = $575/yr. or about 23% reduction.
I can buy a lot of conservation for 6 large and blow the $575/yr. on beer - at least until rate reform catches up with me. Seems a better use of the financial resources to me, but opinions vary.
Another way to look at it: the S.P. system will save $575/yr. more in electric bill and cost a net of $6,192 up front. Maybe not a great return when compared to some alternate investment that will give you some annual return and STILL RETURN YOUR $6,192 AT THE END OF THE PERIOD. I'm a bit conservative, don't count chickens before thry're hatched, and assume the panels will have zero salvage (resale or property value enhancement) value. If I'm wrong I'll be pleasantly surprised rather than disappointed.Leave a comment:
-
watts are watts.... regardless of the efficiency in producing the watts, the output is what we are purchasing.Leave a comment:
-
Duh.....
First example..... 250 watts + 38% = 345 watts
Second Example .... 250 watts + 31% = 327 watts
This has nothing to do with lowering $$$ per watt installed, which is the goal.
Sunpower wants you to believe you're getting something, for nothing.Leave a comment:
-
That is fact.
Trying to charge more because you claim something possibly works marginally better is never an easy sell.Last edited by russ; 05-02-2015, 01:39 PM.Leave a comment:
-
This is directly from Sunpower, It says nothing about "foot print" size... only that S/P panels work better, and J.P.M. has the opinion that they dont.Leave a comment:
-
Get a life? Tell that to Sunpower dealers, not me. What is your point getting down on a brand and citing only price then?Leave a comment:
-
^The problem is wherever I go on this forum you are there banging away at one particular brand. How constructive is that? Perhaps if you had empirical data I'd lay-off. Maybe there are folks out there who absolutely need a bigger panel for a smaller footprint. I don't know, you don't know.Leave a comment:
-
^The problem is wherever I go on this forum you are there banging away at one particular brand. How constructive is that? Perhaps if you had empirical data I'd lay-off. Maybe there are folks out there who absolutely need a bigger panel for a smaller footprint. I don't know, you don't know.Leave a comment:
-
If I'm being presumptuous here I apologize: Probably the stick in the eye to Sunpower part, huh ?
I welcome substantive, constructive criticism. I don't read either of those in your comment.
You don't like it, don't read it.
Take want you want. Scrap the rest.Leave a comment:
-
^Never ends with you , does it.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: