Understood and generally agreed, except maybe that a leak might develop from material dryout/temp. fatigue and not be discovered until it rains maybe some months later. I'd think it might be better if discovered early - like immediately after remediation. if for no other reason to remove the time factor from SolarCity's playbook.
My point on a soak/check was that, if done, and the roof remediation was sufficient and tight, a soak would do no harm, cost little and provide some comfort factor. But, if a barn job was done, an immediate soak done - and done before sign off, might serve as a fast check that would be pretty hard to argue about if it went to something like small claims court. SolarCity took their time with the removal. I'd suggest a homeowner can certainly take a day/2 to get around to a sign off, especially if some confirmation/testing of the job integrity seems to be in order or a matter of common sense. Seems to me the large(r) potential benefits outweigh the relatively small costs.
My point on a soak/check was that, if done, and the roof remediation was sufficient and tight, a soak would do no harm, cost little and provide some comfort factor. But, if a barn job was done, an immediate soak done - and done before sign off, might serve as a fast check that would be pretty hard to argue about if it went to something like small claims court. SolarCity took their time with the removal. I'd suggest a homeowner can certainly take a day/2 to get around to a sign off, especially if some confirmation/testing of the job integrity seems to be in order or a matter of common sense. Seems to me the large(r) potential benefits outweigh the relatively small costs.
Comment