Thoughts on this quote

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Just Steve
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2022
    • 20

    #1

    Thoughts on this quote

    Good evening everybody, I have been lurking around this forum for a bit, I have gotten a few quotes but they have been pretty high $kw. I would like to solicit opinions on this quote.
    I know a lot of folks don't like micro inverters but out of 4 quotes only one used string inverters and their quote was $$$$ national company.
    My roof does not face in the ideal direction 1/2 the system will be facing 60 deg NE "PV Wats 8,160 kWh/Year* System output may range from 7,833 to 8,434 kWh per year near this location".
    And the other half will be facing 240 deg SW, "PV Wats 9,643 kWh/Year* System output may range from 9,256 to 9,966 kWh per year near this location". I know I could drastically reduce the cost by not doing the battery but due to health issues I'm not really up for dealing with a generator in the ice and snow storms that knock out my power. I also want the wife to have to deal with anything when I'm not home. The price is worth it to have heat, refrigeration and lights when the grid is down.
    Thanks for any and all opinions
    Steve


    3/19/2022

    Solar Benefits Analysis - Recommended Plan



    Steve
    Poughkeepsie, NY 12603

    COMPONENTS

    Solar Panels:

    (41) Q-CELL 400 BOB

    Inverters:

    (41) Enphase Energy IQ

    Racking:

    Iron Ridge Racking

    Critter Guards



    Panels 41
    Watts Per Panel 400
    Total System Watts DC 16,400

    INSTALLATION DETAILS $69,232.00

    Solar Installed $48,872.00
    (1) Generac PWRcell 18kWh Battery Back up w/LMD $20,360.00


    INCENTIVE DETAILS
    Total Contract Price (including other services, if any) $69,232.00
    NYSERDA Rebate ($0.50/watt) $8,200.00
    Net Contract Price $61,032.00
    State Tax Credit (25% Post-Rebate, $5,000 cap) $5,000.00
    Federal Tax Credit (26% Post-Rebate ***) $15,868.32

    After Rebate & Incentive Investment: $40,163.68








  • Mike 134
    Solar Fanatic
    • Jan 2022
    • 423

    #2
    WOW Honestly, I'd skip the solar get a natural gas/propane generator with auto transfer switch and invest the remaining $30,000. You could live to a 100 and never recover the $40,000 cost going with solar and batteries. (Should replace the standby batteries ever 10 years if you depend on them to work)

    Comment

    • SunEagle
      Super Moderator
      • Oct 2012
      • 15151

      #3
      I agree with Mike 134. Even if those IQ inverters do provide 400watts each you are still looking at close to $2.50/watt and a very poor chance of any payback but they will provide some cost relief.

      Instead of the battery system I would spend the money on a whole house generator with automatic transfer switch and starting. While propane may be expensive the generator will still provide much more power then that 18kWh battery system and should cost less then replacing that battery at the end of its life.

      You can still get power from the solar panel system but a generator will provide many more kWh then that battery and IMO cost less.

      Comment

      • Just Steve
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2022
        • 20

        #4
        Originally posted by SunEagle
        I agree with Mike 134. Even if those IQ inverters do provide 400watts each you are still looking at close to $2.50/watt and a very poor chance of any payback but they will provide some cost relief.

        Instead of the battery system I would spend the money on a whole house generator with automatic transfer switch and starting. While propane may be expensive the generator will still provide much more power then that 18kWh battery system and should cost less then replacing that battery at the end of its life.

        You can still get power from the solar panel system but a generator will provide many more kWh then that battery and IMO cost less.
        Thats an option I didn't think about, I'm going to look into it.

        Comment

        • Just Steve
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2022
          • 20

          #5
          Originally posted by Mike 134
          WOW Honestly, I'd skip the solar get a natural gas/propane generator with auto transfer switch and invest the remaining $30,000. You could live to a 100 and never recover the $40,000 cost going with solar and batteries. (Should replace the standby batteries ever 10 years if you depend on them to work)
          My investments are doing fine, I don't need more market exposure but will look into generator plus solar. Needs to be propane, no NG where I live.

          Comment

          • J.P.M.
            Solar Fanatic
            • Aug 2013
            • 14995

            #6
            Originally posted by Just Steve

            My investments are doing fine, I don't need more market exposure but will look into generator plus solar. Needs to be propane, no NG where I live.
            Good, then keep your investments healthy and rethink the whole solar/battery thing. Begin by getting more informed. Get a book: "Solar Power Your home for Dummies". ~ 25 buck +/- some at amazon/bookstores and disabuse yourself of the peddler hype and that of their media shills, or friends/neighbors who probably know less than you about the subject.

            As others seem to suggest, consider skiping the batteries. You can buy a lot of propane and the equipment to burn it as well as a lot of help to run that equipment once in a while for a lot less than the $20+K an overpriced battery bank will cost.

            Make arrangements for help during power interruptions and get a propane fired generator. Better, cheaper, more practical during power outages. Also, unless you plan on some effective method to remove snow from the arrays, plan for some reduced winter production from snow accumulations on the panels. That's one of the things solar peddlers either ignore or soft peddle.

            Also, unless you have a lot of shade, and in spite of what the solar peddlers may tell you for reasons they aren't usually willing to share with their marks, I'd skip the micros as they violate the KISS principle big time - a lot of duplicate electronics that are sensitive to heat, cold and the elements in a harsh, exposed environment that's about as hot, cold and inaccessible as any in/on your home.

            If cost effectiveness has any place in your consideration(s) to get PV, if you have so much shade such that micros are mandated (which is about the only semi logical reason for complicating things with micros), that calls into question the financial sense PV makes in the first place because less sun == less electricity production == less bang for the solar buck.

            Welcome to the neighborhood.

            Comment

            • SunEagle
              Super Moderator
              • Oct 2012
              • 15151

              #7
              Originally posted by Just Steve

              My investments are doing fine, I don't need more market exposure but will look into generator plus solar. Needs to be propane, no NG where I live.
              Depending on the size of the propane tank you get installed you may be able to find a company that comes out every so often to fill it. In the long run it should be cheaper then using 20 - 40 gal bottles of propane.

              Comment

              • Mike 134
                Solar Fanatic
                • Jan 2022
                • 423

                #8
                you sound like the type of guy that drills down into details. Try this calculator because you can plug in multiple arrays facing different directions.

                Home - System Advisor Model (SAM) (nrel.gov) It's an upgrade from the PTwatts program It will give you more info than you'll ever be able to digest

                Comment

                • oregon_phil
                  Solar Fanatic
                  • Jan 2019
                  • 497

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Just Steve
                  Good evening everybody, I have been lurking around this forum for a bit, I have gotten a few quotes but they have been pretty high $kw. I would like to solicit opinions on this quote.
                  I know a lot of folks don't like micro inverters but out of 4 quotes only one used string inverters and their quote was $$$$ national company.
                  My roof does not face in the ideal direction 1/2 the system will be facing 60 deg NE "PV Wats 8,160 kWh/Year* System output may range from 7,833 to 8,434 kWh per year near this location".
                  And the other half will be facing 240 deg SW, "PV Wats 9,643 kWh/Year* System output may range from 9,256 to 9,966 kWh per year near this location". I know I could drastically reduce the cost by not doing the battery but due to health issues I'm not really up for dealing with a generator in the ice and snow storms that knock out my power. I also want the wife to have to deal with anything when I'm not home. The price is worth it to have heat, refrigeration and lights when the grid is down.
                  Thanks for any and all opinions
                  Steve


                  3/19/2022

                  Solar Benefits Analysis - Recommended Plan



                  Steve
                  Poughkeepsie, NY 12603

                  COMPONENTS

                  Solar Panels:

                  (41) Q-CELL 400 BOB

                  Inverters:

                  (41) Enphase Energy IQ

                  Racking:

                  Iron Ridge Racking

                  Critter Guards



                  Panels 41
                  Watts Per Panel 400
                  Total System Watts DC 16,400

                  INSTALLATION DETAILS $69,232.00

                  Solar Installed $48,872.00
                  (1) Generac PWRcell 18kWh Battery Back up w/LMD $20,360.00


                  INCENTIVE DETAILS
                  Total Contract Price (including other services, if any) $69,232.00
                  NYSERDA Rebate ($0.50/watt) $8,200.00
                  Net Contract Price $61,032.00
                  State Tax Credit (25% Post-Rebate, $5,000 cap) $5,000.00
                  Federal Tax Credit (26% Post-Rebate ***) $15,868.32

                  After Rebate & Incentive Investment: $40,163.68

                  A post titled "Reviews/thoughts on Generac PWRCell for UPS with hybrid solar?" would give you some feedback for people considering Generac PWRCell. Also, if I recall, there is another discussion about Generac requiring an internet connection for device control. i.e. Phone app talks to cloud, cloud talks to PWRCell.

                  Also, you could go to the Generac website for some latest reviews. One reviewer was noticing battery charging wasn't happening during cold weather and wasn't told during any time during the "process" that Lithium batteries have temperature limitations. You mentioned snow, ice and storms. If the battery cabinet is outside, then the battery might turn itself off because it's too cold.

                  Comment

                  • J.P.M.
                    Solar Fanatic
                    • Aug 2013
                    • 14995

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mike 134
                    you sound like the type of guy that drills down into details. Try this calculator because you can plug in multiple arrays facing different directions.

                    Home - System Advisor Model (SAM) (nrel.gov) It's an upgrade from the PTwatts program It will give you more info than you'll ever be able to digest
                    You can do the same with PVWatts. It just takes 2 runs. Use the hourly output option and sum the parameters.

                    I've been using SAM as a registered user since its original issue. It's useful and powerful if you know what it's doing and the concepts involved. I certainly and strongly encourage anyone to use any tools available to them. But without a decent engineering background to understand what SAM's asking for and what it's outputting, SAM is pretty much useless, or less so.

                    Maybe Just Steve has such a background, but from what he writes, it doesn't sound like it.

                    While I'm big on learning as much as possible about solar energy, if Just Steve is like most folks I've helped or attempted to help to get up to speed with SAM (most of who usually and quickly walk away from it when they see what's required), my guess is it'll take him longer to get proficient enough (and he certainly can if he so chooses) to understand how to get all the inputs right and so get meaningful output than it will to simply do two PVWatts runs, use the hourly output and sum the results.

                    From what he's described as what he's looking for so far, IMO, at this time Just Steve will get more of what he needs out of the Dummies book than a deep dive into solar engineering and its finer points.

                    An analogy: You don't need a degree in combustion engineering to tune up the internal combustion engine in your vehicle.

                    BTW, SAM isn't an upgrade to PVWatts. They share some data bases for inputs but they are use different algorithms, are different in purpose and have different genealogy. The modeled results for each will be similar but probably slightly different for the same application. SAM was birthed by NREL. PVWatts genetic heritage came from Sandia labs. Another difference: PV modeling is almost a side show for SAM. It does many other types of modeling applications than simply PV.

                    Comment

                    • chrisski
                      Solar Fanatic
                      • May 2020
                      • 571

                      #11
                      Don't want to derail the thread, but is it common to live in an area where a generator like a Generac is not an option?

                      There are some HOAs where I live where having a Generac installed would be in violation of HOA rules.

                      Comment

                      • Mike90250
                        Moderator
                        • May 2009
                        • 16020

                        #12
                        Originally posted by chrisski
                        .....There are some HOAs where I live where having a Generac installed would be in violation of HOA rules.
                        That will change as the Grid gets more brittle. First, the HOA officers will be the only ones allowed to have one installed.....
                        Powerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
                        || Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
                        || VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A

                        solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
                        gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Lister

                        Comment

                        • Mike 134
                          Solar Fanatic
                          • Jan 2022
                          • 423

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Mike90250

                          That will change as the Grid gets more brittle. First, the HOA officers will be the only ones allowed to have one installed.....
                          So true about the muckity mucks that run an HOA but some states are beginning to address that.

                          Solar Access: Issues and Policy Options | State, Local, and Tribal Governments | NREL

                          Comment

                          • SunEagle
                            Super Moderator
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 15151

                            #14
                            Originally posted by chrisski
                            Don't want to derail the thread, but is it common to live in an area where a generator like a Generac is not an option?

                            There are some HOAs where I live where having a Generac installed would be in violation of HOA rules.
                            Then CHANGE THE RULES. I expect there will be people that use generators if the grid goes down for a while. And the HOA will not be able to do anything about it.

                            Comment

                            • J.P.M.
                              Solar Fanatic
                              • Aug 2013
                              • 14995

                              #15
                              Originally posted by SunEagle

                              Then CHANGE THE RULES. I expect there will be people that use generators if the grid goes down for a while. And the HOA will not be able to do anything about it.
                              While I whole heartedly agree with the sentiment expressed and suspect in areas with recent and ongoing power outages that as more folks get ICE generators, HOA's will be faced with defacto CC & R changes that result in after the fact rule changes.

                              Still, at this time the percentage of homes with standby ICE generators is still quite small, although I suspect that percentage is larger in HOA communities than in the general population - mostly due to the monkey see, monkey do/keep up with the Jones attitude more common in HOA's as well as more affluence.

                              FWIW, and this is little more than anecdotal, I belong to 3 HOA's in So. CA, none of them in fire prone areas. At this time, none of the 3 make any mention, direct or indirect, of on site power generation using ICE's either for or against. While they all have rules covering excess noise and quiet enjoyment, there is no mention in any of those 3 sets of CC & R's of/or any rules covering noise emitted by stationary generators.

                              CC & R's partially respond to general trends, usually as a reaction to when new things and trends disturb the perceived status quo rather than being proactive about how things are changing.

                              As for changing the rules, small numbers of folks will have little chance against social inertia. When a convenience is changed to a necessity by common perception or brainwashing, the CC & R's in effect get reduced to an afterthought or less. CC & R changes then follow.

                              Comment

                              Working...