No significant shade on an array means things can get simpler - as in no need for optimizers or micros for shade considerations. Fewer electronics to fail as well. KISS applies.
As for array orientation, if you are after maximizing annual production per installed STC kW, run PVWatts for your location. For ground mount and max. annual production per installed STC kW, I'd suggest starting with an azimuth of maybe 190 - 200 deg. and a tilt at local latitude. Do a few runs and zero in on the optimum azimuth/tilt combination. If seasonal adjustment is planned, rerun at tilts of latitude +15 deg. for winter and latitude - 15 deg. for winter. Do 3 runs, one for winter, one for summer and one for spring and fall. Some finagling is necessary. Exact dead nuts max. orientation is not necessary. This ain't rocket science. +/- 5-10 deg. for both az. and tilt is probably close enough and may well make construction easier/better/cheaper/faster.
As for array orientation, if you are after maximizing annual production per installed STC kW, run PVWatts for your location. For ground mount and max. annual production per installed STC kW, I'd suggest starting with an azimuth of maybe 190 - 200 deg. and a tilt at local latitude. Do a few runs and zero in on the optimum azimuth/tilt combination. If seasonal adjustment is planned, rerun at tilts of latitude +15 deg. for winter and latitude - 15 deg. for winter. Do 3 runs, one for winter, one for summer and one for spring and fall. Some finagling is necessary. Exact dead nuts max. orientation is not necessary. This ain't rocket science. +/- 5-10 deg. for both az. and tilt is probably close enough and may well make construction easier/better/cheaper/faster.
Comment