Good plan!
Because in most installations you can't disconnect the DC array at the panels*. That means that if a firefighter wants to cut through a conduit to get access to a hole in a roof, if it's DC he might end up with a non-extinguishable arc at the end of the conduit. And if he manages to touch them in the wrong order he could get fried.
That's not exclusively a DC problem; that would be a problem with any power source that can't be easily shut off. With DC it's a bit more serious because a) your body's reaction is all wrong (DC makes you seize up, not jerk around like AC does) and b) with DC the arc is a lot harder to extinguish, since current flow doesn't stop 120 times a second. Thus labeling the conduit "DC" tells a firefighter that he might be dealing with a power source that won't get shut down by pulling the breakers, and might just result in a pretty nasty permanent arc.
DC presents some additional problems as a means of distribution compared to AC. For one, it is harder to extinguish arcs, so switches and circuit breakers have to be designed differently, with greater gaps and in some cases blowout magnets. For another it poses a somewhat greater risk of electrocution because of the aformentioned reaction to DC compared to AC. But there's a reason that people are slowly switching to it for applications where efficiency and cost matter - it lets you send more power down the same copper than AC does.
(* - a segmenting combiner avoids this problem but is not common in PV installations.)
For what ever reason they were discussing DC from roof panels and the fact that firemen were concerned for what ever reason. This was a discussion they were mumbling about. I also heard them say something about marking DC conduit every 10' may be a requirement etc. Not sure why but?
That's not exclusively a DC problem; that would be a problem with any power source that can't be easily shut off. With DC it's a bit more serious because a) your body's reaction is all wrong (DC makes you seize up, not jerk around like AC does) and b) with DC the arc is a lot harder to extinguish, since current flow doesn't stop 120 times a second. Thus labeling the conduit "DC" tells a firefighter that he might be dealing with a power source that won't get shut down by pulling the breakers, and might just result in a pretty nasty permanent arc.
DC presents some additional problems as a means of distribution compared to AC. For one, it is harder to extinguish arcs, so switches and circuit breakers have to be designed differently, with greater gaps and in some cases blowout magnets. For another it poses a somewhat greater risk of electrocution because of the aformentioned reaction to DC compared to AC. But there's a reason that people are slowly switching to it for applications where efficiency and cost matter - it lets you send more power down the same copper than AC does.
(* - a segmenting combiner avoids this problem but is not common in PV installations.)
Comment