Which is more reliable, Panel Optimizers versus Microinverters

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nerdralph
    replied
    Originally posted by solardreamer

    This makes more sense. There are also multiple models and sizes for microinverters but it's much less expensive to stock them.
    It's much less expensive not to stock either. I keep a spare string inverter on hand. Other than general supplies like MC4 connectors, wire, and some panel clamps, I don't keep inventory. If I need 20 panels and a 7.6 kW inverter for a job, I order them from my distributor and send a guy with a trailer to pick it up and bring it to the customer site. With prices falling like they have been over the past year, keeping any inventory can be quite expensive. Both SolarEdge and Enphase have had terrible quarterly results due to high inventory and falling prices.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    I have heard that with some installers, actually finding the roof trusses are optional
    I'd like to support that statement.
    I've watched most of the installs in my HOA, ~ 175 and counting. It's always been fun and an eye opener to watch installers/workers setting posts or support fixtures for panels into roofs.
    The usual method around here and usually quite easily observable from the ground that I've observed from the "Larry with a ladder" type installers, and others for that matter, is that a hole will be drilled in the approximate or guessed location of a rafter. If missed, another hole is drilled an inch or so to one side or another. The process usually continues until the rafter is found. The holes remain and may/may not be sealed. Installers don't seem to care if their help from the big box parking lot temp. employment agency know about hitting a rafter, or much of anything else for that matter.
    Reputable installers do a lot better but usually the supervision is less than necessary to prevent such B.S. shenanigans.
    Thank goodness there is not much wind around here. Factors of safety exist for a reason, but the day a strong wind storm shows up around here may well be a day of reconning that will overcome such conservative methods.

    Leave a comment:


  • solardreamer
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger

    With string inverters, the installer needs to inventory several inverter models to match up with different size strings. With microinverters, they just need to stock one model and size.
    This makes more sense. There are also multiple models and sizes for microinverters but it's much less expensive to stock them.

    Leave a comment:


  • peakbagger
    replied
    Originally posted by solardreamer

    For your friend, there is no shading issue so how would string calcs would be that much harder?
    Someone needs to do a bit of prep work at the office to enter the highest and lowest temp and then match the string sizing to the inverter. No need to do that with Microinverters.

    With string inverters, the installer needs to inventory several inverter models to match up with different size strings. With microinverters, they just need to stock one model and size.
    Last edited by peakbagger; 02-10-2024, 05:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • peakbagger
    replied
    I have heard that with some installers, actually finding the roof trusses are optional

    Leave a comment:


  • solardreamer
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    My understanding is that solar firms prefer going with microinverters as there are no string calcs and no shading issues. The crews head out with a pallets of panels, cases of string inverters and trunk cable. The only thing custom is the length of the trunk cable and the length of the racking.
    For your friend, there is no shading issue so how would string calcs would be that much harder?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike 134
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    My understanding is that solar firms prefer going with microinverters as there are no string calcs and no shading issues. The crews head out with a pallets of panels, cases of string inverters and trunk cable. The only thing custom is the length of the trunk cable and the length of the racking.
    That makes 100% sense to me. After doing my own install I realized you could train monkeys to do the solar roof work, 2 hardest things I encountered were 1-do not fall off the roof, and 2 finding the roof trusses/joists.

    Leave a comment:


  • peakbagger
    replied
    My understanding is that solar firms prefer going with microinverters as there are no string calcs and no shading issues. The crews head out with a pallets of panels, cases of string inverters and trunk cable. The only thing custom is the length of the trunk cable and the length of the racking.

    Leave a comment:


  • solardreamer
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    His installer is recommending the microinverter route (which to me is a cop out to make their job easier).
    How is the job easier with microinverters? Seems like it would be harder in terms of more labor required. Perhaps, more money for more labor is the motivation.

    Originally posted by peakbagger
    Am i correct on my assumption that optimizers should have a lower fail rate than micros?
    Doubt it. I would take Enphase micros over SolarEdge optimizers.


    Without shading issues, there is not much power conversion advantages for micros or optimizers vs string inverters. Unless per panel monitoring is required, string inverters are likely the better choice.

    Leave a comment:


  • nerdralph
    replied
    Up here, BayWa and Guillevin have good inventory of Solis 4G-US plus series inverters. Frankensolar carries the Growatt hybrid inverters for about the same price as the Solis non-hybrid.

    Leave a comment:


  • peakbagger
    replied
    I am glad you confirmed my observations that stand alone string inverters by mainstream companies appear to be fading away. Fronius units seem to be unavailable in the US market and I have not seen a lot of activity by SMA. Given the RSD requirements it looks like some companies just do not seem to want to supply the non occupied niche.

    Leave a comment:


  • oregon_phil
    replied
    Originally posted by peakbagger
    Like HP reportedly sending a "routine" software update to brick a printer if it detects a non OEM print cartridge

    I have already warned him that there seems to be ongoing numerous issues related to the connection out to the internet and that data logging and fault detection that should reside on his equipment is now at the mercy of a remote server. I can only "push on that rope" so hard before I give up. Ultimately its his money to do what he wants with. He has 20 year old string inverter system that has been faultless except for the utility running out of spec for a couple of years until he complained enough. My guess is he assumes that all PV equipment is that reliable.
    My friend tends to be very much into reading and recording daily production
    Even my SMA -40 (and my -41 spare inverter) string inverter has been obsoleted after 5 years. It seems like SMA is moving to the hybrid market and is yielding the string only market to the lower cost suppliers. I would still find a string inverter supplier that can be used without the internet (many out there) and if monitoring was still an issue, I would put a CT (like Shelly EM) on the solar breaker and not worry about individual panel output.

    Leave a comment:


  • J.P.M.
    replied
    Originally posted by bcroe
    If shade is not a problem, a simple string setup has only a fraction
    as many connections, and no electronics on the roof. More
    complexity equals more failures. Bruce Roe
    Amen.

    Leave a comment:


  • peakbagger
    replied
    Like HP reportedly sending a "routine" software update to brick a printer if it detects a non OEM print cartridge

    I have already warned him that there seems to be ongoing numerous issues related to the connection out to the internet and that data logging and fault detection that should reside on his equipment is now at the mercy of a remote server. I can only "push on that rope" so hard before I give up. Ultimately its his money to do what he wants with. He has 20 year old string inverter system that has been faultless except for the utility running out of spec for a couple of years until he complained enough. My guess is he assumes that all PV equipment is that reliable.



    Leave a comment:


  • oregon_phil
    replied
    +1

    Also, Enphase requires an internet connection to fully fulfill warranty requirements. I really dislike the requirement of having an internet connection as a prerequisite for full warranty. Communications modules are usually the weak link in the system (compare comm module warranty with microinverter warranty) and communication standards can change over 25 years.

    While I'm at it, this requirement for cloud connection is just another gateway for outsiders to try to gain access to your home network. Nowadays, it's easier to hack a company's cloud system and gain access to your system using legitimate credentials.

    Companies can also push firmware updates onto your inverter system without your knowledge making troubleshooting a system a nightmare with many unknowns.

    Leave a comment:

Working...