In California there are a number of large commercial solar farms in the desert. At other locations I have observed smaller installations on hillside pasture land and adjacent to flat farm land in the Central Valley. In the case of the hillside pasture land I occasionally see sheep grazing under the panels. In the Central Valley water is an issue and not all land appears to be utilized for farming for reasons that may relate to water allocations or cost of transporting water. I don;t know what the zoning issues are in California with respect to agriculturally zoned land either.
In looking at some of these smaller installations I also notice that the panel angles are sometimes closer to horizontal than I would have suspected. On further research I understand that the power density per acre can be increased by using these lower angles and thereby reducing the spacing between arrays. This appears to result in a configuration that produces more AC power per acre. I would guess that these systems run higher AC to DC ratios.to optimize system performance. . I can understand that if someone looked only at the array configuration it could be argued that they are suboptimal. However from a system standpoint (array, inverter and land), they may be optimizing the ROI.
In looking at some of these smaller installations I also notice that the panel angles are sometimes closer to horizontal than I would have suspected. On further research I understand that the power density per acre can be increased by using these lower angles and thereby reducing the spacing between arrays. This appears to result in a configuration that produces more AC power per acre. I would guess that these systems run higher AC to DC ratios.to optimize system performance. . I can understand that if someone looked only at the array configuration it could be argued that they are suboptimal. However from a system standpoint (array, inverter and land), they may be optimizing the ROI.
Comment