Hello,
I'm new to this forum so I might as well start out big. Please excuse the verbosity but I want to make sure I don't leave out any pertinent information. First, here is a consolidation of the points covered in more detail my posting and about which I would like your comments, in whatever technical detail you care to provide... The more detailed the better...
1. Panel configurations (min, max, orientation);
2. SMA OptiTrac performance & enabling/disabling;
3. Significance of chimney and vent pipe shading;
4. Sunny Portal Web Site;
5. System calculators/formulae;
6. Inverter monitoring;
Now the details...
My daughter recently had a 10.5kW system installed on her two-story home consisting of 2ea SMA SB6000TL-US-22 inverters and 39ea Hanwha Q-Cells Model Q.PEAK BLK-G3 270W Monocrystalline Modules. These are typical generic panels and seem to have about the same specifications as many others. The panels were installed on 3 different azimuths as follows, where each has a tilt of 23 degrees:
15 East panels at 100 degrees;
11 South panels at 190 degrees;
13 West panels at 275 degrees;
The installer originally suggested using a SolarEdge power optimizer system but since their proposal indicated that there would be no shade I suggested that an SMA string inverter system might be preferable due to fewer points of potential failure. I simply didn't want my daughter to have to potentially deal with the hassle and possible expense of rooftop failures. I know there are guarantees and all that, but who knows what those might be worth in the future. Anyway, after the installation was done it turns out that there is significant chimney shading on the South array until about 10:30AM every morning, and I estimate that this will be the case year around. This situation would have been obvious to even the most casual observer during a proper site survey, but my experience with many contractors is that they get extremely upset when you try to tell them they're doing something wrong, even if they obviously are. Ignoring this shading issue for a moment, the part of this project that convinced me that the installers didn't have a clue what they were doing was that they split the 39 panels up into four strings of 10-10-10-9, and since there are only three azimuths it means that at least one and possibly more of the strings span more than one azimuth. My understanding is that this is one of the worst things that can be done since, in effect, it is equivalent to intentional, permanent, and significant shading. When they were asked to provide a wiring diagram for our review somehow they conveniently could not produce one. It seems like they want to make things right so I can't help but think that the only issue here is incompetence. Thus, it has become apparent to me that if the problems are to be corrected I am going to have to do the brain work for them, so I have a few questions and concerns about what I have come up with that hopefully can be answered by readers of this forum...
I see several re-configuration options, all of which involve moving one or more panels to a different azimuth and a certain amount of rewiring, but I believe there is probably room to do it. Here are the four potential new configurations I envision, all of which ensure that no single string spans multiple azimuths:
8E+8E+10S+13W
8E+8E+11S+12W
14E+11S+14W
13E+13S+13W
I have calculated the minimum and maximum number of panels suitable for use with the SMA SB6000TL-US-22 inverters and found it to be 8 and 14, respectively. I used the formulae provided on the CivicSolar Website (after I corrected some errors in them) to do these calculations. (Do you know of a better way?) I'd provide the URL but I understand that newbies to this forum are not supposed to do that. The only issue I have with an 8-panel string is that, although they supply enough voltage to reach the inverter's start voltage of 150v, they may not always supply enough to reach the inverter's "Rated MPPT Voltage" of 210V. I tried to find out from SMA's level 1 technical support agent what the significance of operating below this voltage would be and if any derating information was available, but I might as well have been talking to someone at Jack-in-the-Box, and the wait would have been much less (and I'd at least have gotten a Jack-Taco). I then left a message for their higher level tech support to contact me, but of course they never did. The potential issue I have with a 14-panel string is that I don't know if it's advisable to operate that close to the limit of the cold weather open circuit voltage, especially if there should be an extremely cold morning sometime. Along these same lines, do you know if it shortens the life of an inverter to operate it very close to its maximum usable DC power rating, or to incur occasional clipping?
Aside from my 8-panel and 14-panel concerns are issues related to increasing or decreasing the number of South-facing panels. On the one hand South is obviously the best azimuth in the Northern hemisphere. On the other hand, South is the array that gets chimney shading until about 10:30AM every morning, so any panels I add to it will not be operating at their full potential until after that. However, moving South panels to the East or West will also reduce their output. So, which choice is better? Is the amount lost by shading greater than the amount lost by an East or West azimuth? I don't know how to calculate for such a shading issue. If it were not for this concern I would think the 13E+13S+13W configuration would be the best compromise.
SMA OptiTrac?
By reading SMAs OptiTrac propaganda one would think that it's a panacea for chimney shading problems (and possibly world peace, too), but many forum posts I've read seem to indicate that it has little or no practical effect. I considered re-contacting SMA for more technical details and test information about this, but given my previous experience with them I decided it would be a waste of time. What is your experience in such situations? I understand that OptiTrac can be enabled/disabled over the Internet, but currently the only Internet access to the system I have is via SMA's Sunny Portal Web site, which doesn't give access to inverter settings. What is the cheapest way to get appropriate access?
Other shading:
One East panel has a 6" long shadow from a 2" diameter vent pipe all day. I'm assuming that it's best not to take any unnecessary chances and this panel should be moved. There is a similar situation in the West side but there is also a 6" diameter sheet metal vent there; that shading is only in the morning. Do you think any of this shading might be significant?
Sunny Portal Web Site:
I have a 7.84kW SMA SB7000TL-US-22 system myself, and when my installer initially set it up and I went to the Sunny Portal Web site I could see the performance of my system, but in addition on the left of the display window was a forum where different SMA users posted information about their systems and discussed miscellaneous things. I then asked my installer to give me access to several other systems like mine so I could do comparisons. That worked fine but now I now longer see any forum information. Is there some way I can regain access to this?
Yearly system production calculator:
My installer (not my daughter's) uses the "California Solar Initiative Incentive Calculators" on the csi-epbb Web site (no URL because I'm a newbie) to determine system expectations. I have no problems with this but I was just wondering if there are other such calculators the might be recommended. There is a link to such a calculator in another place in the solarpaneltalk forums, but that link is dead.
Other Inverter Monitoring:
I read an article some time back about an SMA user who coded up some kind of TCP/IP application that let him monitor real time inverter information on his computer. I don't know if he used C, C++, C#, Java, or what, but those or any others are fine with me. Do any of you know anything about doing this?
If you got this far, thanks for reading,
Ray
I'm new to this forum so I might as well start out big. Please excuse the verbosity but I want to make sure I don't leave out any pertinent information. First, here is a consolidation of the points covered in more detail my posting and about which I would like your comments, in whatever technical detail you care to provide... The more detailed the better...
1. Panel configurations (min, max, orientation);
2. SMA OptiTrac performance & enabling/disabling;
3. Significance of chimney and vent pipe shading;
4. Sunny Portal Web Site;
5. System calculators/formulae;
6. Inverter monitoring;
Now the details...
My daughter recently had a 10.5kW system installed on her two-story home consisting of 2ea SMA SB6000TL-US-22 inverters and 39ea Hanwha Q-Cells Model Q.PEAK BLK-G3 270W Monocrystalline Modules. These are typical generic panels and seem to have about the same specifications as many others. The panels were installed on 3 different azimuths as follows, where each has a tilt of 23 degrees:
15 East panels at 100 degrees;
11 South panels at 190 degrees;
13 West panels at 275 degrees;
The installer originally suggested using a SolarEdge power optimizer system but since their proposal indicated that there would be no shade I suggested that an SMA string inverter system might be preferable due to fewer points of potential failure. I simply didn't want my daughter to have to potentially deal with the hassle and possible expense of rooftop failures. I know there are guarantees and all that, but who knows what those might be worth in the future. Anyway, after the installation was done it turns out that there is significant chimney shading on the South array until about 10:30AM every morning, and I estimate that this will be the case year around. This situation would have been obvious to even the most casual observer during a proper site survey, but my experience with many contractors is that they get extremely upset when you try to tell them they're doing something wrong, even if they obviously are. Ignoring this shading issue for a moment, the part of this project that convinced me that the installers didn't have a clue what they were doing was that they split the 39 panels up into four strings of 10-10-10-9, and since there are only three azimuths it means that at least one and possibly more of the strings span more than one azimuth. My understanding is that this is one of the worst things that can be done since, in effect, it is equivalent to intentional, permanent, and significant shading. When they were asked to provide a wiring diagram for our review somehow they conveniently could not produce one. It seems like they want to make things right so I can't help but think that the only issue here is incompetence. Thus, it has become apparent to me that if the problems are to be corrected I am going to have to do the brain work for them, so I have a few questions and concerns about what I have come up with that hopefully can be answered by readers of this forum...
I see several re-configuration options, all of which involve moving one or more panels to a different azimuth and a certain amount of rewiring, but I believe there is probably room to do it. Here are the four potential new configurations I envision, all of which ensure that no single string spans multiple azimuths:
8E+8E+10S+13W
8E+8E+11S+12W
14E+11S+14W
13E+13S+13W
I have calculated the minimum and maximum number of panels suitable for use with the SMA SB6000TL-US-22 inverters and found it to be 8 and 14, respectively. I used the formulae provided on the CivicSolar Website (after I corrected some errors in them) to do these calculations. (Do you know of a better way?) I'd provide the URL but I understand that newbies to this forum are not supposed to do that. The only issue I have with an 8-panel string is that, although they supply enough voltage to reach the inverter's start voltage of 150v, they may not always supply enough to reach the inverter's "Rated MPPT Voltage" of 210V. I tried to find out from SMA's level 1 technical support agent what the significance of operating below this voltage would be and if any derating information was available, but I might as well have been talking to someone at Jack-in-the-Box, and the wait would have been much less (and I'd at least have gotten a Jack-Taco). I then left a message for their higher level tech support to contact me, but of course they never did. The potential issue I have with a 14-panel string is that I don't know if it's advisable to operate that close to the limit of the cold weather open circuit voltage, especially if there should be an extremely cold morning sometime. Along these same lines, do you know if it shortens the life of an inverter to operate it very close to its maximum usable DC power rating, or to incur occasional clipping?
Aside from my 8-panel and 14-panel concerns are issues related to increasing or decreasing the number of South-facing panels. On the one hand South is obviously the best azimuth in the Northern hemisphere. On the other hand, South is the array that gets chimney shading until about 10:30AM every morning, so any panels I add to it will not be operating at their full potential until after that. However, moving South panels to the East or West will also reduce their output. So, which choice is better? Is the amount lost by shading greater than the amount lost by an East or West azimuth? I don't know how to calculate for such a shading issue. If it were not for this concern I would think the 13E+13S+13W configuration would be the best compromise.
SMA OptiTrac?
By reading SMAs OptiTrac propaganda one would think that it's a panacea for chimney shading problems (and possibly world peace, too), but many forum posts I've read seem to indicate that it has little or no practical effect. I considered re-contacting SMA for more technical details and test information about this, but given my previous experience with them I decided it would be a waste of time. What is your experience in such situations? I understand that OptiTrac can be enabled/disabled over the Internet, but currently the only Internet access to the system I have is via SMA's Sunny Portal Web site, which doesn't give access to inverter settings. What is the cheapest way to get appropriate access?
Other shading:
One East panel has a 6" long shadow from a 2" diameter vent pipe all day. I'm assuming that it's best not to take any unnecessary chances and this panel should be moved. There is a similar situation in the West side but there is also a 6" diameter sheet metal vent there; that shading is only in the morning. Do you think any of this shading might be significant?
Sunny Portal Web Site:
I have a 7.84kW SMA SB7000TL-US-22 system myself, and when my installer initially set it up and I went to the Sunny Portal Web site I could see the performance of my system, but in addition on the left of the display window was a forum where different SMA users posted information about their systems and discussed miscellaneous things. I then asked my installer to give me access to several other systems like mine so I could do comparisons. That worked fine but now I now longer see any forum information. Is there some way I can regain access to this?
Yearly system production calculator:
My installer (not my daughter's) uses the "California Solar Initiative Incentive Calculators" on the csi-epbb Web site (no URL because I'm a newbie) to determine system expectations. I have no problems with this but I was just wondering if there are other such calculators the might be recommended. There is a link to such a calculator in another place in the solarpaneltalk forums, but that link is dead.
Other Inverter Monitoring:
I read an article some time back about an SMA user who coded up some kind of TCP/IP application that let him monitor real time inverter information on his computer. I don't know if he used C, C++, C#, Java, or what, but those or any others are fine with me. Do any of you know anything about doing this?
If you got this far, thanks for reading,
Ray
Comment