Equipment Changed After Loan Option Was Quoted

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • affiliatenow
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 2

    #1

    Equipment Changed After Loan Option Was Quoted

    To start, I am not a fan of the 2.9% escalator built into the leases here in Arizona... but I know they are the nature of the beast and pretty standard. I had a Sun Edison Dealer come in and quote a 20 yr. lease, and they came up with the following:


    Shading: 100%
    Orientation / Slope: 207 / 22
    System Size (DC): 9.45kW
    Panels x Watts: 35 x 270 SunEdison panels
    Inverter Type: String
    Derate Factor: 0.84
    Annual Degradation: 0.7%
    Est. Annual Production: 17, 482 kWh

    So on the 20 year lease, I was starting at $147/mo (plus $23/mo. est. grid utility) and after the escalator kicks in full my bill will go to $252.52/mo. (plus $43.92/mo. est. grid utility) for year #20.

    With my current electric bills ranging from $120-$360 per month (average is $199/mo.) I did not feel that paying $300/mo. for my cheapest electric bill ever (even in 20 years) is something that was good.

    So I asked for them to provide me with the numbers on a loan option, and they switched the equipment on me explaining the SunEdison panels are heavily subsidized into the leases.

    So the loan option was as follows:

    Total Loan Amount: $36,985
    Federal Est. Credit (paid to dealer): -$11,095.50
    AZ State Est. Credit (to Dealer): -$ 1,000
    Net Loan Amount: $24,889.50
    Rate: 3.99%
    Term: 20 years

    Monthly Payment: $161.63
    Est. Utility Grid: $ 23

    Total Est. Monthly: $184.63

    That Total Est. Monthly of $184.63 will be surpassed in year #4 of the lease...

    This "Loan" system though changes to the following equipment:

    Shading: 100%
    Orientation / Slope: 208 / 22
    System Size (DC): 9.45kW
    Panels x Watts: 31 x 305 LG panels
    Inverter Type: String (SMA Sunny Boy 7700TL)
    Annual Degradation: 0.7%
    Est. Annual Production: 17, 481 kWh

    So I am leaning to the Loan Option as that cost is locked in for 20 years and is met in year #4 of the lease... but they switched me to the LG panels and that Sunny Boy Inverter.

    Am I "cheaping" out on the equipment to get an overall lower cost by choosing the LG & Sunny Boy (Loan) over the SunEdison (lease)?
  • Naptown
    Solar Fanatic
    • Feb 2011
    • 6880

    #2
    Short answer no
    This is all good equipment
    NABCEP certified Technical Sales Professional

    [URL="http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?5334-Solar-Off-Grid-Battery-Design"]http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showth...Battery-Design[/URL]

    [URL]http://www.calculator.net/voltage-drop-calculator.html[/URL] (Voltage drop Calculator among others)

    [URL="http://www.gaisma.com"]www.gaisma.com[/URL]

    Comment

    • solar pete
      Administrator
      • May 2014
      • 1820

      #3
      Originally posted by affiliatenow
      To start, I am not a fan of the 2.9% escalator built into the leases here in Arizona... but I know they are the nature of the beast and pretty standard. I had a Sun Edison Dealer come in and quote a 20 yr. lease, and they came up with the following:


      Shading: 100%
      Orientation / Slope: 207 / 22
      System Size (DC): 9.45kW
      Panels x Watts: 35 x 270 SunEdison panels
      Inverter Type: String
      Derate Factor: 0.84
      Annual Degradation: 0.7%
      Est. Annual Production: 17, 482 kWh

      So on the 20 year lease, I was starting at $147/mo (plus $23/mo. est. grid utility) and after the escalator kicks in full my bill will go to $252.52/mo. (plus $43.92/mo. est. grid utility) for year #20.

      With my current electric bills ranging from $120-$360 per month (average is $199/mo.) I did not feel that paying $300/mo. for my cheapest electric bill ever (even in 20 years) is something that was good.

      So I asked for them to provide me with the numbers on a loan option, and they switched the equipment on me explaining the SunEdison panels are heavily subsidized into the leases.

      So the loan option was as follows:

      Total Loan Amount: $36,985
      Federal Est. Credit (paid to dealer): -$11,095.50
      AZ State Est. Credit (to Dealer): -$ 1,000
      Net Loan Amount: $24,889.50
      Rate: 3.99%
      Term: 20 years

      Monthly Payment: $161.63
      Est. Utility Grid: $ 23

      Total Est. Monthly: $184.63

      That Total Est. Monthly of $184.63 will be surpassed in year #4 of the lease...

      This "Loan" system though changes to the following equipment:

      Shading: 100%
      Orientation / Slope: 208 / 22
      System Size (DC): 9.45kW
      Panels x Watts: 31 x 305 LG panels
      Inverter Type: String (SMA Sunny Boy 7700TL)
      Annual Degradation: 0.7%
      Est. Annual Production: 17, 481 kWh

      So I am leaning to the Loan Option as that cost is locked in for 20 years and is met in year #4 of the lease... but they switched me to the LG panels and that Sunny Boy Inverter.

      Am I "cheaping" out on the equipment to get an overall lower cost by choosing the LG & Sunny Boy (Loan) over the SunEdison (lease)?
      Hello affiliatenow and welcome to solar panel talk.

      Short answer is no, panels are panels and SMA inverters are very good, cheers. Leasing is not that popular around these parts most seem to prefer a purchase over lease or PPA. Cheers

      Comment

      • affiliatenow
        Junior Member
        • Sep 2015
        • 2

        #4
        Thanks for the quick responses! That makes me feel better that I am not the only one thinking that signing a 20 year lease with a 2.9% escalator is not as good as locking in a 3.99% 20 year loan.

        I understand the appeal of the Lease when they first came out... but with Loans being so low right now, they seem like the no brainer.

        3.99% vs 58% (2.9% x 20) increase over 20 years... plus the added bonus of increased home value with the loan!

        Comment

        • Naptown
          Solar Fanatic
          • Feb 2011
          • 6880

          #5
          Here in Maryland I have compared leases with a purchase using a 2.99% interest rate over a 12 yeat term and it works out to be a much better deal than any lease currently available
          Cash posititive in the first year and every year and no hassle selling your home.
          NABCEP certified Technical Sales Professional

          [URL="http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?5334-Solar-Off-Grid-Battery-Design"]http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showth...Battery-Design[/URL]

          [URL]http://www.calculator.net/voltage-drop-calculator.html[/URL] (Voltage drop Calculator among others)

          [URL="http://www.gaisma.com"]www.gaisma.com[/URL]

          Comment

          • Ian S
            Solar Fanatic
            • Sep 2011
            • 1879

            #6
            For Arizona, that purchase price seems high. You need to get more quotes. Sounds like you're with APS. Be aware that the base rate is almost sure to go up within a year or two.

            Comment

            • SanDiego_installer
              Member
              • Oct 2013
              • 46

              #7
              That is $3.91/Watt.....too high. Agree with Ian S, get more bids.

              LG panels and SMA inverter are top of the line, good luck.

              Comment

              • Yaryman
                Banned
                • Aug 2015
                • 245

                #8
                Just a couple thoughts on the numbers you presented.

                $24,889.50 20 year loan at 3.99% yields at loan payment of $150.83 instead of $161.63 as you mentioned.
                Also that loan would have you paying $11,308 in interest over the course of the loan.

                I used Yahoo's mortgage loan calculator to figure out the payments.

                Use our free mortgage calculator to estimate your monthly mortgage payments. Account for interest rates and break down payments in an easy to use amortization schedule.

                Comment

                • Carl_NH
                  Solar Fanatic
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 131

                  #9
                  If you are going to get a loan, then shop for a system from 3-4 different vendors then get the financing arranged. You should get the federal tax and state tax credits - not the dealer.

                  I would look at a home equity line for this and also if you can put 30% down you will get that back as a tax rebate next year.

                  You are getting good gear as others have stated, but for 9.45KW system should be $32-33K range, and if you put $9K down and finance $23K for 10 years @ 3.5% is $225 a month ($27K total) and you will get your $9K back in 2015 with the tax credit. Using a home equity loan you will be able to write off the interest.

                  So there are much better deals out there for systems and financing that you should investigate!

                  Good Luck,

                  Comment

                  Working...