A few questions about a post boosting enphase systems if someone cares to reply please - some of the points don't make sense to me - excerts from a previous post follow:
4. "A BIG one, levelized cost of electricity. There is no $3000-5000 replacement of a major inverter in the second decade of service, otherwise standard with non-microinverter-based solar power arrays."
?seems like this is not a positive if you end up replacing individual panels over time due to inverter failures
7. "Easier, and cheaper, to design. Centralized inverters have to be designed to specific string sizes. Microinverters work on any string size from one on up. This saves a good amount of expensive engineering overhead."
? what is the big deal?
8. "Flexibility with mismatched modules and orientation. Traditional inverters require all solar panels to be exactly the same. With Enphase, they can mixed-and-matched. Also, unlike legacy systems, different sections of an array can be oriented in different directions, e.g. both west and south."
?correct - this is not exactly as I understand from other posts?
10. "Energy Harvest. This is probably the most important item: Enphase systems are proven producers of at least 10% (and up to 25%) MORE POWER, over identical installations of centralized inverter technology. This lowers the cost per watt produced, fewer expensive solar modules are needed to achieve the same output. Microinverters also operate efficiently at higher temperatures than big inverters, due to their digital components."
?Up to 25% more power generated?
12. "Monitoring. Enphase has an optional, but highly advanced "Enlighten" monitoring system that will email you if there's a systemic failure. This works especially well since each microinverter has an IP address. Other companies provide monitoring, but this system is simple, allows users to view performance and even post it on their website. A subscription fee applies, but there is no wiring required, since Enlighten transfers all data through the AC wiring itself."
?be interesting to have an idea of this ongoing cost?
13. "Overall Savings. Enphase makes the reasonable claim that its "Balance of System" and labor installation costs are 12-15% over previous systems, due to its simplicity. This is an overall gain of 20% for the ROI."
?an enphase system is really that much cheaper?
14. "Shading. Centralized inverters optimized each solar system to the weakest perfoming panel. A single maple leaf on a single panel can reduce overall efficiency by 3% across the entire array. Microinverters limit shading impact to a single panel."
?a single maple leaf = 3%?
15. "Basic efficiency. 95-95.5% CEC-rated efficiency is higher than average."
?correct? what would be average?
4. "A BIG one, levelized cost of electricity. There is no $3000-5000 replacement of a major inverter in the second decade of service, otherwise standard with non-microinverter-based solar power arrays."
?seems like this is not a positive if you end up replacing individual panels over time due to inverter failures
7. "Easier, and cheaper, to design. Centralized inverters have to be designed to specific string sizes. Microinverters work on any string size from one on up. This saves a good amount of expensive engineering overhead."
? what is the big deal?
8. "Flexibility with mismatched modules and orientation. Traditional inverters require all solar panels to be exactly the same. With Enphase, they can mixed-and-matched. Also, unlike legacy systems, different sections of an array can be oriented in different directions, e.g. both west and south."
?correct - this is not exactly as I understand from other posts?
10. "Energy Harvest. This is probably the most important item: Enphase systems are proven producers of at least 10% (and up to 25%) MORE POWER, over identical installations of centralized inverter technology. This lowers the cost per watt produced, fewer expensive solar modules are needed to achieve the same output. Microinverters also operate efficiently at higher temperatures than big inverters, due to their digital components."
?Up to 25% more power generated?
12. "Monitoring. Enphase has an optional, but highly advanced "Enlighten" monitoring system that will email you if there's a systemic failure. This works especially well since each microinverter has an IP address. Other companies provide monitoring, but this system is simple, allows users to view performance and even post it on their website. A subscription fee applies, but there is no wiring required, since Enlighten transfers all data through the AC wiring itself."
?be interesting to have an idea of this ongoing cost?
13. "Overall Savings. Enphase makes the reasonable claim that its "Balance of System" and labor installation costs are 12-15% over previous systems, due to its simplicity. This is an overall gain of 20% for the ROI."
?an enphase system is really that much cheaper?
14. "Shading. Centralized inverters optimized each solar system to the weakest perfoming panel. A single maple leaf on a single panel can reduce overall efficiency by 3% across the entire array. Microinverters limit shading impact to a single panel."
?a single maple leaf = 3%?
15. "Basic efficiency. 95-95.5% CEC-rated efficiency is higher than average."
?correct? what would be average?
Comment