Aren't monocrystalline panels more efficient than polycrystalline? I have been reading a spec sheet very closely and I'm wondering why Solon's 225 - 240 watt panels (specifically Solon Black 230/15 vs. Solon Blue 230/07) have the same efficiencies? The panel size and solar cells are also the same measurements. Any insights? Thanks, Walt
Polycrystalline vs. Monocrystalline efficiency
Collapse
X
-
-
Kind of difficult to tell based on the spec sheet but the Mono looks like it has a black backsheet and the poly appears to have a white one. The darker blacksheet runs hotter and therefore lowers the module's performance / efficiency.
It could also be related to a chemical coating / cell fab process difference.
I'm actually very curious about this POLY product. I need to see one in person. I'm curious what cell spacing they are using to achieve that density, based on their cell size (6.2") and frame size. You need a gap between cells to allow for movement based on movement caused during thermal contractions.
By having proper spacing you loose published efficiency, but the trade-off is the panels will actually work in 5 years. Not saying Solon didn't account for that, I'm just wondering how they did it...Comment
-
I guess a lot of it would depend on what brand of panel you are using. We've seen great results from Canadian Solar and Schuco mono's.Comment
-
CEC listing gives unbiased (but far from perfect) real-world ratings:
Comment
-
Mono crystalline solar cells vs Polycrystalliane
Mod note:
Nice copy and paste job however it goes against copyright law.
You can copy only a small portion of a document (say maybe 5 to 10%) and then provide a link to the document. If the link is judged to be against the interest of our sponsor it will be removed.Comment
Comment