SO as a Realtor and a Solar user I agree that homes with Solar are much more desirable on the resale market. As far as setting a standard for value increase on "Solar homes" this is very complicated as the term "Solar Home" means many different thing to different people. For instance a home with a leased solar system can actually diminish the value of a home if the new buyer is looking to purchase with a Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae loan as these loans can not be placed on a home if there is an underlying long term solar lease in place and requires the lessor to remove the lien and then place it back on the home after closing.....most cases this is not an issue but in some cases the leaseholder takes this advantage to rewrite the lease at possibly not as desirable terms.
Owned solar systems will add varying degrees of value based on the age and utility of the system but a newer solar system (especially in CA) will add value and likely even more value in the years to come as the Net Metering agreements currently in place are there for 20 years from the install date are are tied to the location (house) and NOT to the person so it will transfer with the property to the new owner with the remaining term of the original agreement.............and as we are all thinking this will be much better than the Net Metering agreements with the "2.0" versions that will be starting next year.
Owned solar systems will add varying degrees of value based on the age and utility of the system but a newer solar system (especially in CA) will add value and likely even more value in the years to come as the Net Metering agreements currently in place are there for 20 years from the install date are are tied to the location (house) and NOT to the person so it will transfer with the property to the new owner with the remaining term of the original agreement.............and as we are all thinking this will be much better than the Net Metering agreements with the "2.0" versions that will be starting next year.
Comment