The first thing is to change your mindset and get rid of all the lead acid programming we all have and lose it, because it has nothing to do with this technology or lifepo4 chemistry. Then replace it with, lifepo4 is nothing like lead acid in any way, except it stores reusable energy. All charging and discharging are totally different, as is the way cells accept charge.
As karrak has pointed out, storing a lifepo4 cell is the opposite to storing a lead acid battery, lifepo4 loses virtually nothing over very long periods, if stored at the right voltage. Leave a lead acid battery for a few months and it will have lost about a 1/3 of its stored capacity, whilst lifepo4 and most lithium chemistries will retain it's voltage with no lose.
Lifepo4 accepts charge rates and time lines light years ahead of lead acid and should never be charged to over 3.5v or below 3v, unless you want lead acid life spans. it's the same with using lead acid charge parameters, they will reduce live by 75-85%, meaning you will only get 3-5 years if you are lucky. lead acid absorbs energy very slowly and has huge resistance to charge input, compared to lifepo4. It can takes days to recharge a lead acid bank which has got below 12.2v in an off grid system and many people rarely get to full charge because there is load draw on the bank constantly. A lifepo4 of the same capacity will take a few hours, be used and then recharged to full while being used during one day. It will also give you between 30-50% more energy from the same stated capacity and a less than half he weight and size.
Most are waiting for supposed big business to get on board, so they have some delusionary proof this technology works and they stick with these profit growth corporations like slaves to the slaughter. Yet anyone with just a miniscule working brain knows these corporations rely upon repeat sales, short life spans and maintainance of supporting equipment with short term built in redundancy, to increase and sustain their profit growth. Problem with that is, it's all unsustainable in every way and will be the death of current societies over all within the next 5 years probably
If they build lifepo4 system that lasted 15-25 years, they would have no profit growth and as lifepo4 is easy to repair or rejuvenate, with about a 50% original cost recycle value, last century economics just doesn't cut it for this century. So they have to push claims that lithium is no different to lead acid and has an even shorter lifespan, with lots of problems compared to centuries old technology. Those trapped in the last century will probably never get this new technology, or how to use it. Just like they fail to take up lots of other alternatives and much cheaper approaches to the future. So are desperate to maintain their elitist control, over what they have no control over or working knowledge.
The facts are, lifepo4 is not some far out complicated energy storage system, its very simple and is light years closer to what should be a reasonable energy storage system, compared to centuries old dinosaur storage technology.
For off grid, RV, portable energy, safety, economies of scale and reliability, there is nothing like lifepo4. In fact we believe it is superior to li-ion for EV and that will become apparent over the next 5 years, because of safety and reliability. Of course we may see new lithium storage soon, in the form of Li- graphene, in an Aus university they are getting close to that reality. But if you have a system now, that will give you a return within 5 years, then give you free energy for the next 10-20 years. Compared to short life, polluting, heavy cumbersome and inefficient junk, It's a no brainer
Anyone interested in what is happening in Aus, just do a search of lifepo4 installations in Aus, you may be surprised at how advanced we really are, compared to those clinging to the past.
As karrak has pointed out, storing a lifepo4 cell is the opposite to storing a lead acid battery, lifepo4 loses virtually nothing over very long periods, if stored at the right voltage. Leave a lead acid battery for a few months and it will have lost about a 1/3 of its stored capacity, whilst lifepo4 and most lithium chemistries will retain it's voltage with no lose.
Lifepo4 accepts charge rates and time lines light years ahead of lead acid and should never be charged to over 3.5v or below 3v, unless you want lead acid life spans. it's the same with using lead acid charge parameters, they will reduce live by 75-85%, meaning you will only get 3-5 years if you are lucky. lead acid absorbs energy very slowly and has huge resistance to charge input, compared to lifepo4. It can takes days to recharge a lead acid bank which has got below 12.2v in an off grid system and many people rarely get to full charge because there is load draw on the bank constantly. A lifepo4 of the same capacity will take a few hours, be used and then recharged to full while being used during one day. It will also give you between 30-50% more energy from the same stated capacity and a less than half he weight and size.
Most are waiting for supposed big business to get on board, so they have some delusionary proof this technology works and they stick with these profit growth corporations like slaves to the slaughter. Yet anyone with just a miniscule working brain knows these corporations rely upon repeat sales, short life spans and maintainance of supporting equipment with short term built in redundancy, to increase and sustain their profit growth. Problem with that is, it's all unsustainable in every way and will be the death of current societies over all within the next 5 years probably
If they build lifepo4 system that lasted 15-25 years, they would have no profit growth and as lifepo4 is easy to repair or rejuvenate, with about a 50% original cost recycle value, last century economics just doesn't cut it for this century. So they have to push claims that lithium is no different to lead acid and has an even shorter lifespan, with lots of problems compared to centuries old technology. Those trapped in the last century will probably never get this new technology, or how to use it. Just like they fail to take up lots of other alternatives and much cheaper approaches to the future. So are desperate to maintain their elitist control, over what they have no control over or working knowledge.
The facts are, lifepo4 is not some far out complicated energy storage system, its very simple and is light years closer to what should be a reasonable energy storage system, compared to centuries old dinosaur storage technology.
For off grid, RV, portable energy, safety, economies of scale and reliability, there is nothing like lifepo4. In fact we believe it is superior to li-ion for EV and that will become apparent over the next 5 years, because of safety and reliability. Of course we may see new lithium storage soon, in the form of Li- graphene, in an Aus university they are getting close to that reality. But if you have a system now, that will give you a return within 5 years, then give you free energy for the next 10-20 years. Compared to short life, polluting, heavy cumbersome and inefficient junk, It's a no brainer
Anyone interested in what is happening in Aus, just do a search of lifepo4 installations in Aus, you may be surprised at how advanced we really are, compared to those clinging to the past.
Comment