LiFePO4 - The future for off-grid battery banks?
Collapse
X
-
Everyone who uses RC hobby products these days (car/plane) uses power inverters and chargers and most support LiFEPO4. It's not too long until this stuff goes large scale and are offered for off-grid applications. Sometimes, I wish they had used LiFEPO4 for the Boeing Dreamliner 787 rather than Li-Poly from Yuasa.Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
Has anyone run across an inverter/charger designed to charge lifepo4 batteries?
Thanks,
Zak
Yes, we have developed a charge controller and bms System special for LiFePo4 and LiFeYPo4.
If you are interested have a look on our website.
www dot ecs-online dot org
If you have any quesions, about it, feel free to ask us
regards
Falko Jahn
ECS TeamLeave a comment:
-
Local solar provider contacted me this week to discuss installation of what appears to be this system. He's coming to quote on 1 May so I'll update this post when I know what he suggests as a package and also what its going to cost. In Australia we have different energy rates dependant on the time of day you use the power. 2pm to 8pm ...peak period ...costs me about 55 cents per kw/hr. The idea is to use the battery power during peak periods. (the highest cost period). Sounds like a planLeave a comment:
-
Panasonic Corporation has announced it will commence mass-producing a compact long-life lithium-ion battery system for home solar power applications this month.
* *
The Panasonic battery system includes a management unit designed to control charge and discharge of the battery. The system can store surplus electricity generated by rooftop solar panels for use when needed, further reducing the dependence on grid supplied power.
**
The lithium-ion battery has a design life time of 5000 cycles, based on an 80% depth of discharge per cycle. This compares very favourably to traditional deep cycle battery technologies such as AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat) and gel; which may only have a serviceable life of 1,500 cycles when discharged to 80%. Sounds like Lithium Iron is gaining popularity and credibility.Leave a comment:
-
Awesome
Awesome!!!
Mod note - Do not make a one word quote and copy a long paragraphLast edited by russ; 03-23-2013, 11:44 PM.Leave a comment:
-
Hi!
I have an off-grid home with LiFePO4 cells and did this for the *exact* reasoning above - I use it for cooking and all power for my home. I designed the system around the cells, and used a Morningstar MPPT regulator in 'custom' mode.
My pack was US$7000 and came with BMS it is 300Ah 51.2V (nominal 48V)
Any questions?
No more, I now have 80AH of 48V LiFePo4 and enjoying it. Seems that my simple cell balancing is working well also. I have this
Leave a comment:
-
I will follow these developments with interest. I won't need batteries for a few years yet, hopefully by then we will have the energy storage we all dream about!Leave a comment:
-
I was just reading that Eestor is at it again - upped the output numbers greatly but no product yet. Looking for more suckers I guess.Leave a comment:
-
Panasonic Corporation has announced it will commence mass-producing a compact long-life lithium-ion battery system for home solar power applications this month.
* *
The Panasonic battery system includes a management unit designed to control charge and discharge of the battery. The system can store surplus electricity generated by rooftop solar panels for use when needed, further reducing the dependence on grid supplied power.
**
The lithium-ion battery has a design life time of 5000 cycles, based on an 80% depth of discharge per cycle. This compares very favourably to traditional deep cycle battery technologies such as AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat) and gel; which may only have a serviceable life of 1,500 cycles when discharged to 80%. Sounds like Lithium Iron is gaining popularity and credibility.
And depending on the exact chemistry it uses, I may look for tips on building battery bunkers far from the house.Leave a comment:
-
So I'm comparing the cost of AGM deep cycle batteries with LiFePO4 batteries, and it seems that LiFePO4 will win out.
Hear me out...
Goal - Provide 1 kW of power.
Assuming 80% DoD for LiFePO4 and 20%DoD for AGM (Which will give us approximately 5 years for each type of battery), we will need:
x24 3.2V, 16AH of Headway LiFePO4 batteries for a 12.8V, 96AH pack (1.28kW) and
x2 12V, 255AH, Concorde AGM Groupe 8D batteries for 12V, 510AH pack (6.12 kW).
since 80% DoD of 1.28 kW = 1.0 kW and
20% DoD of 6.12 kW = 1.2 kW
Price for x2 Groupe 8D Concorde batteries ~ $1,200
Price for x24 Headway LiFePO4 batteries ~ $600
.. not to mention x24 LiFePO4 batteries only weighs about 30lbs.
I guess the price of the Battery Management System for the LiFePO4 cells and the complexity of the system far exceeds that of the AGM batteries for now. Perhaps the technology is still immature.
Are there any technical barriers from preventing the use of LiFePO4 batteries as solar battery banks? Maybe the discharge rate (100A)?
* *
The Panasonic battery system includes a management unit designed to control charge and discharge of the battery. The system can store surplus electricity generated by rooftop solar panels for use when needed, further reducing the dependence on grid supplied power.
**
The lithium-ion battery has a design life time of 5000 cycles, based on an 80% depth of discharge per cycle. This compares very favourably to traditional deep cycle battery technologies such as AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat) and gel; which may only have a serviceable life of 1,500 cycles when discharged to 80%. Sounds like Lithium Iron is gaining popularity and credibility.Leave a comment:
-
Yes you had better have a high end BMS system. Just off the top of my head that is around 500 to 1000 cellsLeave a comment:
-
a wee bit off track now
While this is true, you cannot justify the expense. LFP batteries have not been proven to last as as long as a good quality FLA battery. When you consider th eLFP option is about 300 to 500R more expensive and only last 1/3 as long, they will not be a serious contender. For now and the foreseeable future LFP will be primarily for the Electric Vehicle market where the cost can be justified since wh/Kg is the most important factor for a EV. wh/Kg for RE applications is not a consideration.
Actually, far in front of the general trade.
I find that here, there is a need for a LiFe battery pack, 100a/h, with a triphase 400v output.
Has anyone ideas on this, please?Leave a comment:
-
While this is true, you cannot justify the expense. LFP batteries have not been proven to last as as long as a good quality FLA battery. When you consider th eLFP option is about 300 to 500R more expensive and only last 1/3 as long, they will not be a serious contender. For now and the foreseeable future LFP will be primarily for the Electric Vehicle market where the cost can be justified since wh/Kg is the most important factor for a EV. wh/Kg for RE applications is not a consideration.Leave a comment:
-
Oops!Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: