Landed in Solar Panel Talk while searching for battery setpoint charging profiles.
I live in Nicaragua and had to replace my batteries recently. Given the political situation in Nicaragua and resulting economic embargoes, the only batteries available were Ritar lead carbon AGMs (DC12-200C). According to the vendor, and Ritar's spec sheet, they are "well" suited to cycle use.
What led to my inquiry is a change in the charging profiles over two spec sheets for the same battery. The spec sheet provided by the vendor (from 2017, V17A-0; link= http://www.ritarpower.com/upimg/20171023205635821.pdf ) lists both a "cycle use voltage" (adsorption?) and a "float charging voltage" setpoint.
Float Charging Voltage 13.6V-13.8V @25C Temp Comp -3mV/C/cell
Cycle Use Voltage 14.6V-14.8V @25C Temp Comp -4mV/C/cell
Although a setpoint range is specified in Ritar's spec sheet, my vendor recommended 14.4 for bulk/absorption and 13.7 for float.
When a friend asked about the batteries I retrieved the spec sheet and noticed it had changed. The 2019 version (V19B-0; link= http://www.ritarpower.com/upimg/20191230111910838.pdf ) had only one setpoint, "cycle use voltage";
Cycle Use Voltage 13.8V-14.0V @25C Temp Comp -4mV/C/cell
and the following text added to the description:
"It is specially designed for daily heavy cyclic discharge use with feature low boost charge voltage, it should not be used under float charge, it must be charged and discharged daily for cyclic use. Especially suitable for the application of PSOC."
The vendor doesn't understand the change and Ritar hasn't returned my inquires for nearly two weeks. If forum members can shed some insight about the change and why just one setpoint (and so different) I would greatly appreciate hearing from you. Given where I live a forum such as this the only expertise I have access to. Thanks in advance.
I live in Nicaragua and had to replace my batteries recently. Given the political situation in Nicaragua and resulting economic embargoes, the only batteries available were Ritar lead carbon AGMs (DC12-200C). According to the vendor, and Ritar's spec sheet, they are "well" suited to cycle use.
What led to my inquiry is a change in the charging profiles over two spec sheets for the same battery. The spec sheet provided by the vendor (from 2017, V17A-0; link= http://www.ritarpower.com/upimg/20171023205635821.pdf ) lists both a "cycle use voltage" (adsorption?) and a "float charging voltage" setpoint.
Float Charging Voltage 13.6V-13.8V @25C Temp Comp -3mV/C/cell
Cycle Use Voltage 14.6V-14.8V @25C Temp Comp -4mV/C/cell
Although a setpoint range is specified in Ritar's spec sheet, my vendor recommended 14.4 for bulk/absorption and 13.7 for float.
When a friend asked about the batteries I retrieved the spec sheet and noticed it had changed. The 2019 version (V19B-0; link= http://www.ritarpower.com/upimg/20191230111910838.pdf ) had only one setpoint, "cycle use voltage";
Cycle Use Voltage 13.8V-14.0V @25C Temp Comp -4mV/C/cell
and the following text added to the description:
"It is specially designed for daily heavy cyclic discharge use with feature low boost charge voltage, it should not be used under float charge, it must be charged and discharged daily for cyclic use. Especially suitable for the application of PSOC."
The vendor doesn't understand the change and Ritar hasn't returned my inquires for nearly two weeks. If forum members can shed some insight about the change and why just one setpoint (and so different) I would greatly appreciate hearing from you. Given where I live a forum such as this the only expertise I have access to. Thanks in advance.
Comment