HELP: Inverter is draining battery almost instantly! Why?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • spoon
    Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 34

    #46
    Originally posted by LETitROLL
    +1, That is why it is so important to really come up with precise concrete numbers on expected loads, if you have that and your solar isolation for the area of use, it takes most of the guess work out and allows you to buy the correct stuff the first time.

    Take on board what all are saying. I will definitely not be expanding beyond 2 panels, certainly for a few years. Mainly because my needs will not increase, I have access to mains power & work for charging or running larger items. This is not at the caravan though.. All we will ever need to run at the van is laptops, phones, car stereo+speakers and LED lighting.

    The only high consumption item that would be nice to run at home is a hand blender, which would simply need a larger inverter, no? This we can do without anyway so not a problem.

    So I think 2x 250w panels will be more than sufficient. What you all seem to be saying is that they will be much more efficient going into a 24v battery bank though... To maximise solar input.

    your solar isolation for the area of use
    P.s. What does that bit mean ^^?

    Comment

    • LETitROLL
      Solar Fanatic
      • May 2014
      • 286

      #47
      Originally posted by spoon
      P.s. What does that bit mean ^^?
      There are maps that give you solar isolation numbers for anywhere on earth (google search), that is a number you can multiply by your panel(s) watt rating to get the actual amount of wattage per day you can expect to produce, it will vary by time of year also, so you can check certain months if you only use solar seasonally.
      In rough numbers if you will run (3) 5w led lights for 3 hours per day that = 3x5x3=45wh (watt hours), to charge a laptop once a day might be est. 70wh, car stereo for 2 hours = est. 30wh, plus charging phones apears to put you in the 200wh to 300wh range per day (if my numbers are close and laptop use is light), if you use 2 laptops every day for 4 hours each you could be as high as 500wh just on those (big difference), anyway once you calculate your loads as close as you can, then you find your solar isolation and multiply your panels total capability by that number, example phoenix in summer is around 6.0, and where I am at (pacific northwest) in winter is only 1.7 (once again, big difference) 500Wx1.7 =850wh, that is gross total and will still be losses to subtract from that, you may be fine starting with one panel and 12v system, just hard to tell until you figure your exact hours of usage of the various devices and what the solar isolation will be for your area at that time. Basically just calculating the amount of production you can expect to produce from a given panel(s) and making sure you do not need more power than they can produce. Hope that helps.

      Comment

      • lkruper
        Solar Fanatic
        • May 2015
        • 892

        #48
        Originally posted by spoon
        So I think 2x 250w panels will be more than sufficient. What you all seem to be saying is that they will be much more efficient going into a 24v battery bank though... To maximise solar input.
        Don't forget that your current charge controller cannot access the power from 2 X 250 panels unless you go to 24v. Your current charge controller cannot even handle all the power from your one existing panel. 250w / 12v = 20.8 amps. If you get 80% of that from the panel, that is 17 amps. Your controller can only handle 15 amps, so you are throwing some away even with your one panel. If you add one more panel you will need to move to 24v to access it, and even then it would be about 17 amps at 24 volts. You are still not using all the power from your panel, BUT it might be enough for two 100AH 12v batteries in a 24v bank. I say "might" because it really depends on your insolation values, or how much quality sun you consistently get, even in the wintertime.

        If I remember correctly, your battery would have sufficient capacity if it were healthy. The least expensive path for you to fix this would be to upgrade your charge controller, so long as you have sufficient sun to charge your battery in one day. That is because you would not need to change all your electronics to 24v.

        The next least expensive path (I think. so run the numbers) would be to add another panel and another charge controller and run the outputs of those two charge controllers to the 12v battery at the same time. That is called stacking the controllers. Call the vendor and make sure that is ok, but many times it is fine to hook two up to a single battery. That would double your charging capability and you would not need to purchase a mains power charger or change out your inverter right away as your are still at 12v. It also gives your some redundancy if one CC dies, you still have one that works.

        If you go the 24v route, you will need two batteries in series and perhaps you can get by with your existing controller depending on how much sun you have because 250w / 24v = 10 amps. However you would probably get 8 amps or less @24v which is at the low side of sufficient charging for 100AH battery bank @ 24v. You would still need to purchase a 24v inverter and also find a way to charge a 24v bank with mains power.

        In any event, I would plan on routinely taking your batteries to 100% with shore power as it is very difficult to do this day in and day out with solar and if you don't get your batteries to 100% they will sulfate and you will lose capacity permanently.

        Comment

        • spoon
          Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 34

          #49
          Originally posted by LETitROLL
          There are maps that give you solar isolation numbers for anywhere on earth (google search), that is a number you can multiply by your panel(s) watt rating to get the actual amount of wattage per day you can expect to produce, it will vary by time of year also, so you can check certain months if you only use solar seasonally.
          In rough numbers if you will run (3) 5w led lights for 3 hours per day that = 3x5x3=45wh (watt hours), to charge a laptop once a day might be est. 70wh, car stereo for 2 hours = est. 30wh, plus charging phones apears to put you in the 200wh to 300wh range per day (if my numbers are close and laptop use is light), if you use 2 laptops every day for 4 hours each you could be as high as 500wh just on those (big difference), anyway once you calculate your loads as close as you can, then you find your solar isolation and multiply your panels total capability by that number, example phoenix in summer is around 6.0, and where I am at (pacific northwest) in winter is only 1.7 (once again, big difference) 500Wx1.7 =850wh, that is gross total and will still be losses to subtract from that, you may be fine starting with one panel and 12v system, just hard to tell until you figure your exact hours of usage of the various devices and what the solar isolation will be for your area at that time. Basically just calculating the amount of production you can expect to produce from a given panel(s) and making sure you do not need more power than they can produce. Hope that helps.
          I think your estimations are pretty close to be honest. Lets say the higher end to be safe at 300wh. My Isolation values are 4.68 in July and 1.13 in Dec. Now, those figues are for SW England and I am as far South West as you can get. So mine will actually be slightly higher than that but lets go with those. By your calculations then I should be looking to get 565wh (500w x 1.13) even in winter... Accounting for losses, I should still be getting my 300wh needs, yeh?

          This is provided I change to the better CC, 2 panels and my batterys are good.

          I think i'm going to go with the victron bluesolar 100/30 http://store.meadotech.com/#!/BlueSo...egory=13042968 So that I'm definately covered for 2x 250w panels.

          Comment

          • spoon
            Member
            • Nov 2015
            • 34

            #50
            Originally posted by lkruper
            The next least expensive path (I think. so run the numbers) would be to add another panel and another charge controller and run the outputs of those two charge controllers to the 12v battery at the same time. That is called stacking the controllers. Call the vendor and make sure that is ok, but many times it is fine to hook two up to a single battery. That would double your charging capability and you would not need to purchase a mains power charger or change out your inverter right away as your are still at 12v. It also gives your some redundancy if one CC dies, you still have one that works.
            Interesting, do the CC's ideally need to be the same model & spec?

            Comment

            • lkruper
              Solar Fanatic
              • May 2015
              • 892

              #51
              Originally posted by spoon
              Interesting, do the CC's ideally need to be the same model & spec?

              Some charge controllers can communicate with each other. I don't see this discussed in the specs for the lower cost ones you are using, but I also don't think it is necessary. Best to call tech support. But if it works like I think it will, each charge controller will be monitoring the status of the battery and changing amps and voltage base on battery charge.

              Should not matter if make and model are different.

              Comment

              • Raul
                Solar Fanatic
                • May 2015
                • 258

                #52
                Originally posted by spoon
                I think your estimations are pretty close to be honest. Lets say the higher end to be safe at 300wh. My Isolation values are 4.68 in July and 1.13 in Dec. Now, those figues are for SW England and I am as far South West as you can get. So mine will actually be slightly higher than that but lets go with those. By your calculations then I should be looking to get 565wh (500w x 1.13) even in winter... Accounting for losses, I should still be getting my 300wh needs, yeh?

                This is provided I change to the better CC, 2 panels and my batterys are good.

                I think i'm going to go with the victron bluesolar 100/30 http://store.meadotech.com/#!/BlueSo...egory=13042968 So that I'm definately covered for 2x 250w panels.


                Good choice, that CC can do both 12-24v . For any reason should you change to 24v this CC will do it . In Cornwall you get max 1.6 sun hrs , Dorset and summerset actually 2.5-2.6, ; when you get your charge Controler it will come pre set on no2 . Leave it like that don't change it . It has 5 presets. The 2 is spot on for sealed pb .

                Comment

                • inetdog
                  Super Moderator
                  • May 2012
                  • 9909

                  #53
                  Originally posted by lkruper
                  Some charge controllers can communicate with each other. I don't see this discussed in the specs for the lower cost ones you are using, but I also don't think it is necessary. Best to call tech support. But if it works like I think it will, each charge controller will be monitoring the status of the battery and changing amps and voltage base on battery charge.

                  Should not matter if make and model are different.
                  Stacking compatibility is much more of an issue for off grid inverters than for chargers, since they have to synchronize their output voltage and frequency.
                  But there is one issue where coordination might be an issue for CCs:

                  Since, even with coordination, the two CCs will have to be connected to different panel arrays there can be both an offset and an overlap between the peak production periods of the two smaller arrays.
                  If you size the CCs so that one CC can deliver more than 1/2 the upper limit charging current for Bulk, to make best use of its array when it is producing and the other array is not, then when both are producing you might get more than the upper limit charging current total going into the batteries.
                  When two CCs coordinate they can limit the total current between the two CCs rather than just independently limit their own charging current.

                  Coordination is normally not an issue for Absorb or Float stages, as long as the two CCs can be set to roughly the same stage voltages.
                  SunnyBoy 3000 US, 18 BP Solar 175B panels.

                  Comment

                  • lkruper
                    Solar Fanatic
                    • May 2015
                    • 892

                    #54
                    Originally posted by spoon
                    I think your estimations are pretty close to be honest. Lets say the higher end to be safe at 300wh. My Isolation values are 4.68 in July and 1.13 in Dec. Now, those figues are for SW England and I am as far South West as you can get. So mine will actually be slightly higher than that but lets go with those. By your calculations then I should be looking to get 565wh (500w x 1.13) even in winter... Accounting for losses, I should still be getting my 300wh needs, yeh?

                    This is provided I change to the better CC, 2 panels and my batterys are good.

                    I think i'm going to go with the victron bluesolar 100/30 http://store.meadotech.com/#!/BlueSo...egory=13042968 So that I'm definately covered for 2x 250w panels.
                    Are you still going to have a 110AH 12v battery? With one panel, you can get 250/12 = 21 amps. With inefficiencies maybe 17 or so. That is 0.15C for your 110AH battery. 10% is safe and some AGMs like 0.2 to 0.3, but if yours is not one of them, you could be pumping too many amps in to your battery at peak sun production. I would call the manufacturer and make sure you know the limits of your battery.

                    Comment

                    • Raul
                      Solar Fanatic
                      • May 2015
                      • 258

                      #55
                      That numax is a dual purpose lead calcium agm rated for starting and deep cycle , it will gobble atleast 20a .

                      Comment

                      • lkruper
                        Solar Fanatic
                        • May 2015
                        • 892

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Raul
                        That numax is a dual purpose lead calcium agm rated for starting and deep cycle , it will gobble atleast 20a .
                        Do you know how long the battery needs to be in absorb? For example, Concorde Lifeline AGMs need at least 2 hours after bulk. If this was Lifeline and he used 20% of his capacity (22 AH) it would take with one panel, 22/17 + 2 hrs or 3.5 hours of insolation. But he only gets 1.6 (in Cornwall in winter). If he had two panels and doubled the amps it would be 22/30 + 2 = 2.7 hours. Much better but still short of filling the battery in winter, and that is only if the battery can take 30 amps. 30 amps is 0.27C and if this battery was a Concorde AGM 0.3 would be fine.

                        Comment

                        • spoon
                          Member
                          • Nov 2015
                          • 34

                          #57
                          Originally posted by lkruper
                          Are you still going to have a 110AH 12v battery? With one panel, you can get 250/12 = 21 amps. With inefficiencies maybe 17 or so. That is 0.15C for your 110AH battery. 10% is safe and some AGMs like 0.2 to 0.3, but if yours is not one of them, you could be pumping too many amps in to your battery at peak sun production. I would call the manufacturer and make sure you know the limits of your battery.
                          Yes, at the moment I can only afford ot change the CC. The Numax is C20... (I do have 2 of them though)

                          Also, I don't think it is AGM... Just sealed Lead Acid.

                          Comment

                          • lkruper
                            Solar Fanatic
                            • May 2015
                            • 892

                            #58
                            Originally posted by spoon
                            Yes, at the moment I can only afford ot change the CC. The Numax is C20... (I do have 2 of them though)

                            Also, I don't think it is AGM... Just sealed Lead Acid.
                            Unless your CC is not working, I don't think you will gain that much with just one panel.

                            Comment

                            • spoon
                              Member
                              • Nov 2015
                              • 34

                              #59
                              Originally posted by lkruper
                              Unless your CC is not working, I don't think you will gain that much with just one panel.
                              Ah, sorry yes... I have the other panel also ordered.

                              Comment

                              • Raul
                                Solar Fanatic
                                • May 2015
                                • 258

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Raul
                                That numax is a dual purpose lead calcium agm rated for starting and deep cycle , it will gobble atleast 20a .
                                My bad , just seed the charging table for this batt . Max bench charging is 8ah . So that would be ok with one panel.

                                Comment

                                Working...